Nobody needs an attack or a semi-automatic weapon! They should be banned, period! Which part of "We are regulated" do not you understand !?

You can not decide what I need. There is no "weapon of attack". It is a made devaluer.

In addition to understanding that the word "good" is not a contraction for "we become," I understand the meaning of the language the founding fathers used. They purposely used these words.

They were against the government insofar as only the government is the government that the people should have, and this government is "the people," not a bureaucracy of order. The term "well regulated" did NOT mean the oversight of the government. It meant to work properly. In order for a militia to function properly, its members need to have their weapons ready soon – NOT an agreed meeting place where all weapons are kept locked up and distributed only by some higher, also known as Arsenal. You no longer hear the term much, but "regularity" is once applied to a properly functioning digestive system. The irregularity suffered from constipation / diarrhea and medications were taken to "stay regular". THAT is what the phrase "well regulated" means to keep things as they should.

At that time, a militia was not an organized group, in which there was a clubhouse where they had met to shoot weapons. A militia was any capable farmer (the majority), worker, educator, lawyer, merchant, merchant … who kept his weapons in and around their homes and workplaces so that he was easily reached to the places in which they were defending they were called.

This is no different from "the people" who are allowed today to keep and wear their weapons for personal or group defense along with hunting / recreation.

YOU are the one who does not understand.