Let’s assume $F(t,W(t))=t*W(t)$. ($W(t)$ is brownian motion)

Then when we calculate partial derivative of $F$ with $t$ (That is $F_t$),

$F_t=W(t)$

But I’m confused because the meaning of partial derivative is observe very small difference when one variable is changed very small with the other variable remaining constant.

So considering this meaning, when the variable $t$ has changed, then there are no way $W(t)$ remains constant!

Although we should make $W(t)$ constant, the $W(t)$ naturally dependent on variable $t$, So it cannot be constant intrinsically.

I have already seen related question : partial derivative

However, it said it depends on situations, when we write the function in the form $W$ or $W(t)$

But, I have never seen that the outcome is different depending on the author’s style “$W$ or $W(t)$“

Then My Question : What is the basis that supports the logic, $F_t = W(t)$, in above equation?