If i have a triangle similar to Pascal’s triangle, except instead of row 1 and row 2 of the triangle being composed entirely of 1s, they are comprised of 3 random numbers, like this one here:

(row 1 is the top, row 2 is the row under that (the one that contains 9 and 3), and etcetera)

Then, if i know only the numbers on row 1 and 2 (4, 9 and 3), is there an easy way for me to find out whether or not a sub-triangle, which is a smaller triangle contained in the larger triangle, exists, without reconstructing the larger triangle?

I.e., In this example, the sub-triangle (21, 30, 36) exists (in orange):

Then, if i know only the numbers on row 1 and row 2, is there any easy way that I can find out whether or not the sub-triangle (21, 30, 36), exists, without reconstructing the larger triangle?