This gives you access to the Internet if the administrator has blocked network access for a part

Depends on how your administrator set up the rules and how sneaky (experienced!) You are. There is a good chance that you have locked your IP address only for the connection via port 80-out (lazy administrator). Therefore, there are several alternatives available, e.g. For example, using a proxy on another port or connecting remotely to another PC or server. However, you'll need to research a bit to see if you can figure out what kind of rules you've used. Success depends on what type of monitoring the administrator has set up and whether you would do so easily.

If you have physical access to a PC or server on the network that has Internet access, this is relatively easy, depending on whether the BIOS is password-protected (usually easy to bypass) and whether you are using the PC / server via USB can start. CD or DVD, but now you are able to do something illegal just to access the internet.

There may be ways to do this at the end of the day, but all will make you lose your job if caught.

As I said earlier, it is better if you are at work and be warned that if you find a way out, you are likely to lose your job.

Agile – How to prevent the CI / CD process from being blocked?

This is more of a process and perhaps a philosophical problem. The development team I'm part of is divided into scrum teams or squads that work on the same product. Occasionally, one of these squads had to get involved in something "big," such as revising a core feature or core component, upgrading the database, and so on. The team's current approach is to lock the current version and just have to work for that squad merge nightly build. Other squads continue to track their sprint targets, but are not allowed to merge the tickets with the nightly build, which prevents them from qualifying for the tickets. Basically, any work other than the "big" change is blocked.

What options do we have to deal with or at least manage the situation, but in a more efficient way? It may also be worth noting that the squads are geographically separate.

Can a Bitcoin transaction be blocked by a specific Bitcoin address? (over mining basins)

Can a Bitcoin transaction be blocked by a specific Bitcoin address? (over mining basins)

Suppose Satoshi Nakamoto wants to send Bitcoin from one of his Bitcoin addresses. Can the mining pools refuse processing? (Considering that in China, 81% of the total bitcoin canker is combined with their pools).

I've heard that a mining pool (if it wants to) might refuse to move your transaction into the mining block so that your shipment gets stuck in the mempool until it gets pegged from another mining pool to the next mining block but I heard that could not be done forever.

Thoughts?

8 – Add a custom Web Form e-mail handler if the delivery is blocked

I'm using the mass operation "star / flag selected submission" in webform views to process webform submissions, which works well.

I would like to be able to send an email to the author if a submission of a web form belonging to one of its nodes has been changed to "Sticky (Flag)". Is there a way to do this?

I've seen that I need to add a custom handler, but I do not know what content.

Enter image description here

DNS is automatically reset secretly and DNS servers are not blocked by the Windows 10 firewall rules

I've noticed that on a Windows 10 computer, if I let DHS configure automatically or change the DNS server to OpenNIC addresses, they will be automatically reassigned

8.8.8.8

75,75,75,75

Malware scanners detect nothing, but colleagues say it's a known attack vector to defeat DNS anonymity.

Only SpyHunter detects and reports this change, though I've found evidence through testing before. It also seems to override DNS configured by the VPN software. It forces itself at the top of the list, so it always checks Google before considering OpenNIC as a fallback.

As a workaround, I have used custom inbound / outbound firewall rules to block all traffic in a wide range of IP addresses. However, these rules do not seem to work because I can still ping these IP addresses.

How can I find and fix the root cause and / or how can I completely block all DNS traffic to these IPs?

The SharePoint site can not be blocked with the Powershell SharePoint Online Management Shell

I follow the document here

and try to block an unmanaged device site with the following command:

Set-SPOSite -Identity https:///sites/ -ConditionalAccessPolicy BlockAccess

But I get the following errors:

Set SPOSite: Parameter set can not be resolved with the specified
named parameters. In the line: 1 character: 1
+ Set-SPOSite-Identity https://xxxxxx.sharepoint.com/sites/VerySecure -C …
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo: InvalidArgument: (:) (Set-SPOSite), ParameterBindingException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId: AmbiguousParameterSet, Microsoft.Online.SharePoint.PowerShell.SetSite

Can someone help me please?

According to Google's URL check, my image URL is blocked by robots.txt – I do not even have one!

I've just noticed that our image system domain has long ceased to be crawled by Google.
The reason for this is that apparently all URLs are blocked by robots.txt – but I do not even have one.

Disclaimer: Due to some configuration checks, I now have a generic Allow-Allow-Robots file in the root of the site. I had none before this hour.

We operate a system for resizing images in a subdomain of our website.
I get a very strange behavior because the search console claims to be blocked robots.txtalthough I have none at all.

All the URLs in this subdomain give me this result when I test it live:

URL that Google does not know

url allegedly blocked by robots

While trying to fix the problem, I created a robots.txt in the root directory:

valid robots

The robot file is even visible in the search results:

Robot indexed

The response headers also seem to be okay:

​HTTP/2 200 
date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 02:22:49 GMT
content-type: image/jpeg
set-cookie: __cfduid=d348a8xxxx; expires=Mon, 26-Oct-20 02:22:49 GMT; path=/; domain=.legiaodosherois.com.br; HttpOnly; Secure
access-control-allow-origin: *
cache-control: public, max-age=31536000
via: 1.1 vegur
cf-cache-status: HIT
age: 1233
expires: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 02:22:49 GMT
alt-svc: h3-23=":443"; ma=86400
expect-ct: max-age=604800, report-uri="https://report-uri.cloudflare.com/cdn-cgi/beacon/expect-ct"
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 52c134xxx-IAD

Here are some sample URLs for testing:

https://kanto.legiaodosherois.com.br/w760-h398-gnw-cfill-q80/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/legiao_zg1YXWVbJwFkxT_ZQR534L90lnm8d2IsjPUGruhqAe.png.jpeg
https://kanto.legiaodosherois.com.br/w760-h398-gnw-cfill-q80/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/legiao_FPutcVi19O8wWo70IZEAkrY3HJfK562panvxblm4SL.png.jpeg
https://kanto.legiaodosherois.com.br/w760-h398-gnw-cfill-q80/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/legiao_gTnwjab0Cz4tp5X8NOmLiWSGEMH29Bq7ZdhVPlUcFu.png.jpeg

What should I do?

Google says my URL is blocked by robots.txt – I do not even have one!

I've just noticed that our image system domain has long ceased to be crawled by Google.
The reason for this is that apparently all URLs are blocked by robots.txt – but I do not even have one.

Disclaimer: Due to some configuration checks, I now have a generic Allow-Allow-Robots file in the root of the site. I had none before this hour.

We operate a system for resizing images in a subdomain of our website.
I get a very strange behavior because the search console claims to be blocked robots.txtalthough I have none at all.

All the URLs in this subdomain give me this result when I test it live:

URL that Google does not know

url allegedly blocked by robots

While trying to fix the problem, I created a robots.txt in the root directory:

valid robots

The robot file is even visible in the search results:

Robot indexed

The response headers also seem to be okay:

​HTTP/2 200 
date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 02:22:49 GMT
content-type: image/jpeg
set-cookie: __cfduid=d348a8xxxx; expires=Mon, 26-Oct-20 02:22:49 GMT; path=/; domain=.legiaodosherois.com.br; HttpOnly; Secure
access-control-allow-origin: *
cache-control: public, max-age=31536000
via: 1.1 vegur
cf-cache-status: HIT
age: 1233
expires: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 02:22:49 GMT
alt-svc: h3-23=":443"; ma=86400
expect-ct: max-age=604800, report-uri="https://report-uri.cloudflare.com/cdn-cgi/beacon/expect-ct"
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 52c134xxx-IAD

Here are some sample URLs for testing:

https://kanto.legiaodosherois.com.br/w760-h398-gnw-cfill-q80/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/legiao_zg1YXWVbJwFkxT_ZQR534L90lnm8d2IsjPUGruhqAe.png.jpeg
https://kanto.legiaodosherois.com.br/w760-h398-gnw-cfill-q80/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/legiao_FPutcVi19O8wWo70IZEAkrY3HJfK562panvxblm4SL.png.jpeg
https://kanto.legiaodosherois.com.br/w760-h398-gnw-cfill-q80/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/legiao_gTnwjab0Cz4tp5X8NOmLiWSGEMH29Bq7ZdhVPlUcFu.png.jpeg

What should I do?

Applications – How do I get past a blocked channel search in NextRadio?

If the data networks (mobile data, WLAN) are deactivated, the NextRadio station search immediately fails instead of hanging.

Try turning on airplane mode and reopen NextRadio. Instead of blocking and displaying the activity indicator, a message should appear indicating that no station list was found. Tap "OK" to continue.

Now deactivate the airplane mode, as the radio is also deactivated. With the base tuner, you can add channels as favorites to give them a name.