[ Politics ] Open Question: Now that there is no Trump / Russian Collusion, what about the credibility of CNN, MSNBC, Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell and other fools?

[ Politics ] Open Question: Now that there is no Trump / Russian Collusion, what about the credibility of CNN, MSNBC, Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell and other fools? ,

Seems Müller has a proof of collusion, right?

In fact, the evidence shows that there were no criminal agreements. Immoral acts, but not criminal collusion.

Here is why. The people working under Trump asked when the stuff from Wikileaks would break. Wikileaks would break it anyway, regardless of Trump and the timing was clearly at Wikileaks.

Besides, you have the inherent problem that you've already talked about 5 levels of separation without Trump actually directing anything. If only one of these links had acted independently without Trump's permission or instruction, you have the interruption that precludes even a collusion of Trump.

,

Why do not the Republicans see any signs of a collusion between Trump and Russia?

We see that the DNC is working indirectly with Russians to produce the Steele dossier.

We also see Britain, Australia and the US State Department organizing meetings between Trump employees and Russians to make them look bad. We also see that the Obama regime is using the state apparatus to spy on the Trump campaign.

By contrast, proof that Trump speaks to Russians seems to be a grave defect that does not even communicate indirectly.

,