Why do liberals / democrats still deny that the entire joke about collusion / disability has been completely exposed and the Dems have lied?

You live in a fantasy world.

In fact, it has been shown that Russia intervened in our elections and that Trump has been working to obstruct the investigation into this matter.

Besides, the world is round, the earth revolves around the sun, we landed on the moon, the Holocaust happened, Obama was born in the US and there are no lizardmen posing as human beings.

I am glad that I could help you with this.

,

Is "no collusion, no obstacle, nothing" an alternative fact?

No, no alternative fact, there are many agreements, obstacles and election manipulations.

The only collusion was that Obama had more flexibility to destroy US nuclear missiles for Russia.
Hillary's US uranium for Russia agreements.
The Billy BJ Clinton agreement with Attorney General Loretta Lynch on the airport runway to rescue Hilly.

The only election manipulation was the DNC preparation for Hilly and against Bernie.
CNN gives Hilly the debate questions.

The only leakages are Obama listening to the Trump team.
Susan Rice unmasked her and deep-seated Democrats who joined the lib media.

The only obstacle to justice is that Hilly destroys her blackberry, deletes her emails and denies that she has sent classified emails on her private server.
And Comey's obstruction of justice, which claimed Hilly had no intention.

,

[ Politics ] Open Question: Now that there is no Trump / Russian Collusion, what about the credibility of CNN, MSNBC, Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell and other fools?

[ Politics ] Open Question: Now that there is no Trump / Russian Collusion, what about the credibility of CNN, MSNBC, Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell and other fools? ,

Seems Müller has a proof of collusion, right?

In fact, the evidence shows that there were no criminal agreements. Immoral acts, but not criminal collusion.

Here is why. The people working under Trump asked when the stuff from Wikileaks would break. Wikileaks would break it anyway, regardless of Trump and the timing was clearly at Wikileaks.

Besides, you have the inherent problem that you've already talked about 5 levels of separation without Trump actually directing anything. If only one of these links had acted independently without Trump's permission or instruction, you have the interruption that precludes even a collusion of Trump.

,

Why do not the Republicans see any signs of a collusion between Trump and Russia?

We see that the DNC is working indirectly with Russians to produce the Steele dossier.

We also see Britain, Australia and the US State Department organizing meetings between Trump employees and Russians to make them look bad. We also see that the Obama regime is using the state apparatus to spy on the Trump campaign.

By contrast, proof that Trump speaks to Russians seems to be a grave defect that does not even communicate indirectly.

,