Content area was not found only for footer

In my site elementor is working properly for header and body. But when I want to edit footer then elementor says following issue-

Sorry, the content area was not found in your page. You must call the_content function in the current template, in order for Elementor to work on this page.

What should I do now?

PHP FansOnly Patrons – Paid Content Creators Platform | Nulled Scripts Download

– Amazon AWS S3 Storage
– Option to hide creators from homepage if you enter “0” in admin->configuration
– Option to hide/show earnings simulator (homepage) in admin->configuration
– Subscriptions were not appearing correctly in admin panel section.
– Total Tips in admin dashboard was not appearing correctly.
– Image orientation on large images fix.
– Fix to “allow guests” feature to see browse creators or user profiles pages (it was not allowing if even logged in)
– Fix to content…

.(tagsToTranslate)xenforo(t)xenforo themes(t)xenforo nulled(t)xenforo free(t)xenforo 2.2(t)nulled(t)nulled script(t)whmcs(t)whmcs nulled(t)scripts(t)nulled scripts(t)vbulletin(t)vbulletin nulled(t)vbulletin 5 nulled(t)xenforo resources(t)wordpress download(t)wordpress nulled forum

sql server – SP2007 (All)UserData nvarchar field content garbled for choice fields

In our Sharepoint 2007, one of our lists field is configured as such:

<Field Type="Choice" DisplayName="Standard" Required="FALSE" Format="RadioButtons" FillInChoice="FALSE" Group="gc_xyz" ID="{e5d39160-a777-4d70-b372-a7ca76305adc}" SourceID="{21f217b9-cbc5-44b8-96b7-2c665aecc37f}" StaticName="Standard" Name="Standard" ColName="nvarchar20" RowOrdinal="0"> <CHOICES> <CHOICE>Yes</CHOICE> <CHOICE>No</CHOICE> </CHOICES> </Field>

But when I look in the AllUserData table (or its view), the data for this field is like this:
| nvarchar20 |

All values are different, as if hashed. How do I read those values to translate them to Yes/No?

sharepoint search – How to create searchable Content Types?

I created a document library with quite a large number of content types which I also display as a column in the library, e.g. Brochures, Photos, Technical Manuals, etc. However, if someone types “brochure”, “photo” or “technical manual” into the SharePoint search bar, none of these documents get listed. For other columns which contain different information about the files, e.g. Product Line or Application, this problem does not exist and that information is searchable. So it occurred to me that I probably need to enable the searchability of content types somehow. Does anyone here have a clue how to go about this?

Do I need to check NuGet dependencies’ DLL md5 to avoid content tampering in WPF?

I have written a WPF application which uses some NuGet packages. The NuGet packages’ DLLs are installed together in the application installation folder. What if the DLLs are swapped with malicious binaries? Does Windows automatically detect that or I have to check all DLLs’ integrity in my program on application start up?

CMS and Block content warning Magento 2.4.2

Does anyone have any information or details on the following warning that I am seeing in the 2.4.2 CMS and Block content areas on save?

Temporarily allowed to save HTML value that contains restricted
elements. Allowed HTML tags are: div, a, p, span, em, strong, ul, li,
ol, h5, h4, h3, h2, h1, table, tbody, tr, td, th, tfoot, img, hr,
figure, button, i, u, br, b

It appears to be produced by saving content with html that contains things like data toggles, iFrame embeds, etc. I’ve got WYSIWYG turned-off globally, but the warning still gets produced.

I believe it has showed-up after my Magento 2.4.1 – 2.4.2 upgrade, but can’t seem to find any information online in regards to the warning, so I’m wondering if anyone has any info here.

A few questions, in-hopes that someone can answer or link to an official doc:

Are data-toggles, iframes and such going to be eliminated in a future release of Magento?

How soon do we have? Next version? Magento 2.5?

Will we be able to whitelist some/all of these items for use in admin content areas?

Thanks for any insight or help.

google apps script – Content control or invisible placeholders

Related to this question dated 5 years ago and where it is stated that “Google Docs doesn’t have invisible placeholders at this time, but it has bookmarks.”

MS Word has ‘content controls’ that allow the insertion of any kind of text with a user-controlled tag. This is great for inserting in-text bibliographic references from an outside source (which is what my add-in does) because I can then not only add the reference itself to the control but also a unique identifying tag that allows me to tie that reference to its source and easily find it and other controls in the document. What this means in practice is that I can change at the click of a button the bibliographic style of all the in-text references and appended bibliography (e.g. APA to Harvard and back again). I can do this in my Word add-in because of the content control.

I can’t figure out how to do this in google docs or even if it is possible. I can’t find (but might have overlooked) any of the invisible placeholders that, five years ago, where not available “at this time”. I could try using bookmarks but I don’t believe it is possible to label them with an identifying tag other than the automatic one generated by google. I could use a combination of this automatic ID and getDocumentProperties() to keep track of things but this immensely complicates matters. An invisible placeholder or tag wrapped around the in-text reference could do the trick too.

My question then is, are there now any invisible placeholders or even content controls similar to Word’s?

plugins – Show Content of shortcode out of div and site structure

With this function, I generate a series of shortcodes, some of which are variable.
The problem is that when this shortcode is placed inside the site, the content of the shortcode is displayed, but the shortcode is displayed at the top of the site and outside the div.
I found after the search that many people had this problem, and their problem has been solved. But my problem was not solved by the solutions they received.
In many cases, they were given the solution to use return but unfortunately, when I use return in this function, the shortcode content is no longer displayed. Also, using ob_start() was suggested, but this solution did not work for me.

Please check my code if you know it is better to rewrite it, but please fix my problem.

function run_shortcod_code_group($attrs){
echo  '<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="'.dirname(plugin_dir_url(__FILE__)).'/css/bootstrap.css" />';
        global $wpdb;
        $post_id = $attrs('post_id');
        $post = get_post( $post_id );
        $tbl_sooreh_user = $wpdb->prefix."sooreh_user";
        $results = $wpdb->get_results("select * from $tbl_sooreh_user  where post_id='$post_id' ",ARRAY_A);
        $all_req = count($results);
        $all_read = 0;
        foreach($results as $row1){
        $all_mandeh = ($all_req - $all_read);
        $darsad_read = round(($all_read * 100) / $all_req);
        $darsad_mandeh = round(($all_mandeh * 100) / $all_req);

    if($all_req > 0){
    echo "
    <div class='amar-home col-4'>
        <h3 class='text-center mb-4'>$post->post_title</h3>
        <div class='progress'>
            <div class='progress-bar progress-bar-striped bg-success' role='progressbar' style='width: $darsad_read%' aria-valuenow='$darsad_read' aria-valuemin='0' aria-valuemax='100'>$darsad_read%</div>
            <div class='progress-bar bg-warning' role='progressbar' style='width: $darsad_mandeh%' aria-valuenow='$darsad_mandeh' aria-valuemin='0' aria-valuemax='100'>$darsad_mandeh%</div>
        <div class='helper-amar'>
            <span class='green-sq'>1</span>
            <span class='yel-sq'>2</span>


user behavior – Can lack of sponsored content reduce trust in a list/ranking?

We’ve been doing some research on a website of ours. On this website we help the user pick the cheapest product for what they are searching for (example: TV / Smartwatch etc).

In the heatmaps we see that if there is no sponsored content, most of the users click the second option. While if we do show sponsored content, most of the users select the first non-sponsored option. The sponsored content is, in all cases, clearly marked paid content.

enter image description here

While doing user interviews (for general research) we noticed that a lot of users say they do not trust ‘websites that compare stuff’ because they do not know if the content is sponsored or not.

In the user interviews after a usertest the user says they picked the second option in the non sponsored list because it looked the best for them. Users that had sponsored content also picked the second one and gave the somewhat the same reply.

However in the sponsored list the 3rd option would be the same option as the 2nd in the non sponsored list.

So my question is as followed, would showing sponsored content increase the trust of the list because it is clearly marked? And when there is no sponsored content, would the user pick the second because they maybe assume the first is sponsored content?

Note: The usertests were qualitative and not quantitative