dnd 5e – Is adding a new player (or new player) a DM decision or a group decision?

When you form a play group and start playing a game, the DM often gets some kind of authority given to it by the game. However, the DM does not (and should not) do the playgroup – the group does. They have as much (but no more) say in group-influencing decisions as any other member of the group.

Just because someone is DM does not automatically give him the right to add (or remove) players without consulting the group, as he does not have the right to know the place and time of the night, the type and the time Presence arbitrarily to change from eating at the table or other from the game details.

Now you could give the DM this authority, but that would have to be something that leaves the group of DMs, and not something that is automatically given to them without discussion. If you did not explicitly have this discussion, you can not and should not make that (or any) decision for the group.

You should talk to the DM as soon as possible, not just for the sake of your current group size, but also because a DM who thinks she can add players at will, without asking, may have a completely different view of her role at the table has you and the rest of the group.

Experience

I was in the position of the DM and the player both as a person who suggested someone new to the table, and as someone who was worried about another suggestion to add a player. So I speak with experience when I say that it is the right way to discuss this as a group (and that not talking to the group means trouble).

We have had several times when the discussion with the group has picked up on some serious issues. For example, the DM once wanted to invite a player who not only (without knowing it) was extremely offensive to several other members of the table, but also had logistical issues that would have a negative impact on everyone. In the end we talked about it as a group and decided not to add the person. I strongly believe that adding this person through the DM without consulting us would not only have caused a great breach of trust, but also killed our group.

We have also had much more positive experiences where everyone talked about it and decided to let someone else in.

Big groups are not easy

Quite apart from the issue of who decides who plays at the table, the number of players can dramatically influence the gameplay. Larger groups are exacerbating many of the issues little groups are already facing and can bring some new ones to the table. If the players and DM do not know this can (but not necessarily) a recipe for Unfun happening.

I played with more and less. There is no perfect number for each table, but you have a right and a foundation on which you can base your concerns about adding people, and you should definitely bring them to your DM.

Architecture – design decision – there was already bad design

If there is an existing project with a flawed design and there is no time to redesign and code-extend the existing code.
For example, in a multi-layered architecture remainder web service, the service layer classes interact directly with each other without an interface (coupled).
So, is it a good decision to set up an interface for my new service that was added in contrast to the rest?

Complexity theory – decision problem – Node with path to all other nodes

Suppose we get a directed graph $ G $ and two vertices $ s, t $, Add a new vertex $ a $ and an edge out $ a $ to $ s $, Also add an edge of $ t $ to all vertices in the chart except $ a $,

Since $ a $ has no incoming edges, if there is a vertex from which all other vertices are reachable, it must be $ a $, Especially for that $ t $ must be reachable by $ a $, Because the only outgoing edge out $ a $ shows up $ s $This can only happen if $ t $ is reachable from $ s $, In this case all other vertices are reachable $ a $over $ t $because we have added outgoing edges from $ t $ to all corners except $ a $,

UK Visitor Visa Request NY Decision Delayed

I was one of the applicants affected by the UKVI's temporary refusal to allow biometrics at the USCIS sites. I finished my biometrics months after I applied online and it was 4 weeks Now that I have sent them the documents (the UK Visa website still claims that 99% of family visit visas are processed within 15 days).

I called the paid hotline a week ago and they said they did "Escalated" my application (which means a guaranteed decision in 15 more days) would be considered sooner. They also said that they will bypass my travel dates (my original date of travel was May 25, but now I have postponed it to June 1), which does not seem to be the case. My application is quite straightforward and I have been on a visiting visa three times in the UK.

  1. Does anyone have an insight into the meaning of this verbal escalation?

  2. I applied for one 10 years visitor visa Since my brother is a British citizen and I do not want to apply every time. I have previously applied for a 1-year visa three times and always received feedback within 15 working days. Could the duration have something to do with the delay in processing?

  3. If I do not withdraw my application and ask them to return the passports (I guess I can) and apply for a high-priced premium service, do I have any options? I do not think so.

Insights / experiences are welcome. Many Thanks!

Expressive Decision Making – Discussions & Help

Emotional thinking and expressive decisions can have a pessimistic impact on the trading results of a foreign exchange trader. Every trader should try to learn how to have a great deal of control over gluttony and feelings, how to handle their asset position, and how to handle fund management. A trader must also know how to manage his trading and financial capacity in an optimistic way so that achieving trading results can be easier for him.

What was the best decision of your life?

Report abuse

more details