14th Amendment Essay Due Process of Law clause define purpose

Terence Ford from Tulare was looking for 14th Amendment Essay Due Process of Law clause define purpose

Jace Dixon found the answer to a search query 14th Amendment Essay Due Process of Law clause define purpose


write my paper

Aurore Montreal's dissertation
Write me an essay by ESL College on presidential elections
8 10-page research paper Example boundaries
shiloh herman melville essay
extended essay bibliography example
How To Write Best College Essay Middle School
pay to write a research proposal for world events
Drafting a service for writing job applications
They keep the animals in cages at night
Essays on future careers
Blog ghostwriter website online
Topics for a 10-page essay on making good decisions
cheap masters essay ghostwriting site usa
pay for my management book review
100 college essay word limit apply to Texas a & m
The best job I have ever had
Gadagari Tower
Esl Custom Essay Ghostwriting service for the college
Topics of environmental study work
100 words essay on Mahatma Gandhi in Hindi Kamina
2-page descriptive essay about basketball
These statements Bruyère Rose
Causes of poverty thesis statement
our day out by willy russell essay
Militant views of Malcolm X.
pay for the best school essay on Donald Trump
100 essay ideas literacy event
ap us history essay grading

write my paper
write my thesis
Buy a dissertation
Writing service for essays

popular website for business planner for the school
What is in a business plan?
Essay for my teacher
Completion of the technical dissertation
popular dissertation authors website for the school
popular mba report help
top rhetorical analysis essay proofreading for doctoral students
essaye de ne pas rire or sourire top 3
Dying of Embarrassment: A Reflection
professional recording tower editing usa
cheap ghostwriting websites online
Video with an extracurricular essay of 150 words
How do I write a proper college application essay?
Write a Life Science Letter
Analysis of who created the evil
123 write my essay download
best history essay writing service reviews de reddit
RCM friend or foe
cheap phd homework help
Blood donation meaning essay
top convincing editorial pages usa
Custom Research Paper ghostwriting site gb
Format for 10-page sources for research
200 words Essay Zoo my favorite teacher in Hindi
Help with my diploma thesis
PR-final declaration
Write my essay English grade 9. Geography
kfc case study china nne
Example of a 10-page research paper
100 college essay karate kid

10000 words essay journey by train 4000 studio fashion 150
Essays about Maggie a girl from the street
appreciate a descriptive essay
Essay I believe in friendliness
Clichés of people with disabilities essay
How do I quote in a paper Apa without author BAC?
ingilizce essay

Evaluation – How to define a function that generates a function at runtime by evaluating selected parts in their definition?

Consider the following functions as an example:

        URLParse[url]/.{"slot"->Inactive[StringReplace][Slot[]," "->"_"]}

If I evaluated it with the following command:

urlModifier["https://www.somewebsite.com/path/slot"]["hello world!"]

It probably fails because of that Slot[] does not agree with that Function,

But if I make a rating on the spot urlModifier["https://www.somewebsite.com/path/slot"] and use the result as input:

URLBuild[<|"Scheme"->"https","User"->None,"Domain"->"www.somewebsite.com","Port"->None,"Path"->{"","path",StringReplace[Slot[]," "->"_"]},"Query"->{},"Fragment"->None|>]&["hello world!"]

It works well.

What should I do? urlModifier to be accepted Slot[] for his Function that it manages?

Nginx RTMP, how to define $ app and $ name

One point I do not understand in the Nginx RTMP module is the $ name and $ app statements. You can see instructions described here, but are not sure how they are defined in nginx. Let's say we have an RTMP stream like this:

rtmp://localhost/live/streams Retrieving this stream and streaming in a HLS format is fine, but for multi-variant streams, I'll need to retrieve that stream using the example provided here: https://github.com/arut/nginx-rtmp modules / wiki / directives # hls_variant

How can I define $ name and $ app here? Can I pull without them and push with these variables? See below:

rtmp {
server {
    listen 1935;

    application src {
        live on;

        exec ffmpeg -i rtmp://localhost/live/streams
          -c:a libfdk_aac -b:a 32k  -c:v libx264 -b:v 128K -f flv rtmp://localhost/hls/$name_low
          -c:a libfdk_aac -b:a 64k  -c:v libx264 -b:v 256k -f flv rtmp://localhost/hls/$name_mid
          -c:a libfdk_aac -b:a 128k -c:v libx264 -b:v 512K -f flv rtmp://localhost/hls/$name_hi;

    application hls {
        live on;

        hls on;
        hls_path /tmp/hls;
        hls_nested on;

        hls_variant _low BANDWIDTH=160000;
        hls_variant _mid BANDWIDTH=320000;
        hls_variant _hi  BANDWIDTH=640000;

Algebra precalculus – Define the domain of $ f (x) = sqrt {x ^ 2-4} $

I'm supposed to be the area of $ f (x) = sqrt {x ^ 2-4} $,

I arrived $ (- 2, infty) $ while the textbook solution is $ (- infty infty) $,

To get to my solution, I set the radicand to greater than or equal to zero:

$ x ^ 2 + 4 ge0 $

$ x + 2 ge0 $ # Square root of each page

$ x ge-2 $

This will give me the domain as $ (- 2, infty) $,

Why is the domain actually $ (- infty infty) $?

Differential Geometry – How to Define Variations of a Curve on a Smooth Manifold

I'm trying to understand how the calculus of variations works when you set smooth manifolds. The texts I read usually change from Euclidean space to manifolds, as if there is no difference, but I am someone who (at least once) has to do things formally.

The case of Euclidean space: $ $ To let $ I = (a, b) subset mathbb {R} $ and let it go $ q_0: I to mathbb {R} ^ n $ be a curve. We define a deformation from $ q_0 $ with fixed endpoints as another curve $ q: I times (- epsilon, epsilon) to mathbb {R} ^ n $ satisfying:

  • $ q (t, 0) = q_0 (t) $ for all $ t in I $,
  • $ q (a, s) = q_0 (a) $ and $ q (b, s) = q_0 (b) $ for all $ s in (- epsilon, epsilon) $,

The variation of $ q_0 $ in terms of deformation $ q $designated $ Delta q $, is defined by:

Left. Delta q_0 (t) right. = left. frac { partial} { partial s} q (t, s) right | _ {s = 0}

Smooth distributor: The definitions of curves and thus deformations work essentially the same and only replace them $ mathbb {R} ^ n $ from a few varied ones $ Q $, To define the variation, you can switch to local charts and then glue the pieces together carefully.

partition wall $ (a, b) $ as $ {a = t_0, t_1, cdots, t_ {n-1}, t_n = b } $ so the limitation of $ q $ to the subinterval $ (t_i, t_ {i + 1}) $ is contained in the local table $ (U_i, phi_i) $, In each diagram, the previous definition of $ Delta q_0 $ is well defined:

Left. delta ( phi circ q_0) (t) right. = left. frac { partial} { partial s} ( phi circ q) (t, s) right | _ {s = 0}

It can also be shown that these "local" deformations coincide with each other at the intersection of diagrams, so that conceptually there should be no problem in sticking the parts together again. I'm not sure though from where This object lives or why, so I do not feel comfortable going on.

Should the deformation be a different curve $ Q $? A curve continues $ TQ $? Does anyone know a clearer way to do this?

Draw – Define the chart topic as a function of two parameters

I want to define a new one PlotTheme as a function of two variables {x, y}, How can I do that?
Here is my attempt:

LabelStyle -> {FontSize -> 18, Black, 
FontFamily -> "Times New Roman"}, 
FrameStyle -> Directive[{Black, Thickness[x]}], Frame -> True,
FrameTicksStyle -> {{directive[Black, Thickness[y]].
guideline[White, Thickness[y]]}, {Guideline[Black, Thickness[y]].
guideline[White, Thickness[y]]}}];
With[{x = 0.005, y = 0.007}, 
Plot[{Sin[z]cos[z]}, {z, 0, 7}, PlotTheme -> "mysty"]]

How do I define a "condensed solution complex" $ RHom_ {D_ {X, x}} (M_x, mathcal {O} _ {X, x} / mathfrak {m} _x ^ k) $?

To let $ M $ Be regular holonomic $ D_X $ Module on a smooth complex variety $ X $, The comparison sentence says so

$$ RHom_ {D_X} (M, mathcal {O} _X) _x cong RHom_ {D_X, x} (M_x, has { mathcal {O}} _ {X, x}). $$
Now the exact definition of $ has { mathcal {O}} _ {X, x} $ suggests that there should also be items
$$ RHom_ {D_X, x} (M_x, mathcal {O} _ {X, x} / mathfrak {m} _x ^ k), $$
to the $ k geq 0 $, However, $ mathcal {O} _ {X, x} / mathfrak {m} _x ^ k $ is not a $ D_ {X, x} $Module (or the null module). Is there an interesting way to understand this expression?

Naively, the result should be a (derived) version of only the set of solutions of the truncated power series containing the differential equations $ Ann_ {D_X} M $,

Ease of Use – Define bulk upload preferences in advance or ask the user to select their preferences each time they upload

The scenario is that a user has organized a series of folders and files that are merged into an online book. The idea is that users can upload all these files and folders at once via drag & drop / click instead of creating them one at a time.

Added Complexity: Users structure their files and folders differently, which often requires custom import settings. There are 3 key settings that vary depending on the user and the book they are creating.

  1. Create one chapter per file (very frequently activated setting)
  2. Number of chapters (useful for the majority of users)
  3. Remove leading numbers (users add numbers to their folders / files to create a custom order, for example, "01__My first chapter" is ordered before "02__Bees can fly".

When a user creates a book for the first time, they will likely stick to the upload settings they define as they will structure the book in their file management system this way.

I have two workflows that I find hard to decide. One is quite seamless, the other provides an extra layer of security to see how things are imported later on the line.

  1. Let the user predefine the bulk import settings. From then on, all uploaded files will inherit these properties. This can be changed manually in a separate options menu. However, when the user uploads their files, they are uploaded and immediately adapted to your import settings. For me, this would be a seamless approach for the user to be able to add more files in the future and present them as they were defined. However, in some situations, you may not need to create ONE chapter per file when uploading. This means that the user must update their settings in advance to ensure that they are uploaded as they expect. Or, upload files one at a time and reorder or change them as needed.

  2. We can still make some predefined settings when a book is first created and empty. However, if the user wants to upload multiple files, he can configure the import settings before uploading. What I do not like is that it introduces an extra step in uploading files in bulk rather than a seamless interaction like Google Drive.

I would like to hear your thoughts. Originally, I wanted it so you could seamlessly upload all the content you wanted and later easily configure the presentation as needed. Due to the developer infrastructure, however, this would be a considerable effort.

I've found it difficult to find examples of mass import / upload upload settings – it's usually starting right now, and so it is, so this is a kind of unique workflow.


c ++ – Predefined values ​​for some values ​​in a template function as with a #define macro (eg template)

I want to overload an operator (eg operator <<) with different types, but also change only 1 or 2 values ​​in the function itself.

I want to get a fancy output of a vector with primitive integer types.
I tried to create a template like function template Operator << ... However, this would have to explicitly set the width and type name on each call Operator << e.g.

I have a minimal code sample (which is not the shortest TBH):



#include "utils.h"

using namespace std;

int main (int argc, char * argv[]) {
vector vec_s_1 = {1, 2, 3, -1, -2, -123};
vector vec_u_1 = {1, 2, 3, 127, 128, 129};
vector vec_s_2 = {1, 2, 3, -1, -2, -123};
vector vec_u_2 = {1, 2, 3, 127, 128, 129};
vector vec_s_3 = {1, 2, 3, -1, -2, -123};
vector vec_u_3 = {1, 2, 3, 127, 128, 129};
vector vec_s_4 = {1, 2, 3, -1, -2, -123};
vector vec_u_4 = {1, 2, 3, 127, 128, 129};

cout << "vec_s_1:" << vec_s_1 << endl;
cout << "vec_u_1:" << vec_u_1 << endl;
cout << endl;
cout << "vec_s_2:" << vec_s_2 << endl;
cout << "vec_u_2:" << vec_u_2 << endl;
cout << endl;
cout << "vec_u_3:" << vec_u_3 << endl;
cout << "vec_s_3:" << vec_s_3 << endl;
cout << endl;
cout << "vec_s_4:" << vec_s_4 << endl;
cout << "vec_u_4:" << vec_u_4 << endl;

return 0;




using namespace std;

ostream & operator << (ostream & os, const vector& obj);



#include "utils.h"

template <> ostream & operator << (ostream & os, const vector& obj) {
size_t size = obj.size (); 
os << "[";
for (size_t i = 0; i < size; ++i) { 
    if (i > 0) {
os << ","; 
stringstream ss; 
ss << "0x" << hex << capitalized << setw (WIDTH) << setfill (& # 39; 0 & # 39;) << (obj[i] & MASK); 
os << ss.str (); 
os << "]";
return os; 

GET_FUNCTION (2, int8_t, 0xFF)
GET_FUNCTION (2, uint8_t, 0xFF)
GET_FUNCTION (4, int16_t, 0xFFFF)
GET_FUNCTION (4, uint16_t, 0xFFFF)
GET_FUNCTION (8, uint32_t, 0xFFFFFFFF)

So far, it works as expected and the output is as I wanted it. It is solved by a call #define separate for each feature (that's a really ugly code).

The output looks like this:

vec_s_1: [0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0xFF, 0xFE, 0x85]
vec_u_1: [0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x7F, 0x80, 0x81]

vec_s_2: [0x0001, 0x0002, 0x0003, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFE, 0xFF85]
vec_u_2: [0x0001, 0x0002, 0x0003, 0x007F, 0x0080, 0x0081]

vec_u_3: [0x00000001, 0x00000002, 0x00000003, 0x0000007F, 0x00000080, 0x00000081]
vec_s_3: [0x00000001, 0x00000002, 0x00000003, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFE, 0xFFFFFF85]

vec_s_4: [0x0000000000000001, 0x0000000000000002, 0x0000000000000003, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFE, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFF85]
vec_u_4: [0x0000000000000001, 0x0000000000000002, 0x0000000000000003, 0x000000000000007F, 0x0000000000000080, 0x0000000000000081]

I need the different widths of the leading zeros in the output as well as the mask to get the exact hex number for each type.

My question is: how can I achieve the same result if I only use templates?

java – How to add symbols like +, * ,, / etc to define a regular expression?

I am trying to create a lexical analyzer for school questions. The point is that comments should start with a double prime "//" and after any of these characters, either exclamation marks and question marks, arithmetic symbols, spaces or special characters. However, these symbols are used for the definition of regular expressions.
The regular expression that I have right now is:

[a-zA-ZÀ-ÖØ-öø-ÿ_0-9 ntr,.;]+

I have taken part of this regular expression from the answer that appears in the following link.
With the regular expression, as I have him so far, he accepts strings like:

// Hello how are you?
// Hello.; Ooo
// 1234

The comments that you do not accept are, for example:

// Hello --------
// comment + - + - *
// hello / +

Although the result is acceptable for small comments, you sometimes want to draw a matrix or an array of characters, which makes this regular expression non-functional.