menus – Hide Submenu in Dashboard, wp v 5.2

I know there are many threads and tutorials out there. but nobody worked for me.

I am trying to hide a submenu of "users". A plugin creates this submenu. My code is as follows …..

add_action (& # 39; admin_init & # 39 ;, & # 39; nek_remove_submenu_pages & # 39;);
Function nek_remove_submenu_pages ()
{
remove_submenu_page (& # 39; edit.php? post_type = acf & # 39;);
remove_submenu_page (& # 39; apexnb-lite & # 39;);
}

How do I hide my platform from a browser to protect my privacy?

It is virtually impossible to do this alone. There are dozens Fingerprint vectors that can be used to detect the operating system you are using or to uniquely identify a browser, and sometimes even your individual hardware, regardless of the operating system you are using. Paradoxically, any changes you make to your browser configuration will actually do it worse, In addition, the Fingerprinting TCP option causes only your browser to hide the platform you are using, simply linking your operating system will affect the operating system (and even system availability).

There are on The solution, however, is to use Tor Browser with the highest security setting. Every installation of Tor Browser tries not to be different from each other (it has a big Anonymity set). It is not perfect, but it is much better than nothing. Using Tor as a proxy also eliminates TCP fingerprinting.

Ability to hide the logic behind the class to improve the readability of the method and refactor class following the SRP

I have an algorithm for creating a version for an entity and save this version among 2 entities:

1) variant

2) category

Interface IEntityVersion
{
string GetVersion ();
}

Public class EntityVersion: IEntityVersion
{
public string GetVersion ()
{
return zero;
}
}

public interface IVariant
{
void Process (variant model, String connectionString);
}

public abstract class BaseVariant: IVariant
{
private read-only IEntityVersion _entityVersion = new EntityVersion ();

public void Process (variant model, String connectionString)
{
To attempt
{
Transform ();
string variantVersion = _entityVersion.GetVersion ();
using (var myConnection = new SqlConnection (connectionString))
{
myConnection.Open ();
using (var transaction = myConnection.BeginTransaction ())
{
To attempt
{
VariantRepo.UpdateVariantVersion (
My connection,
transaction, model.VariantId, variantVersion);

CategoryRepo.UpdateCategoryVariantMapping (
My connection,
transaction, model.CategoryId, variantVersion);

transaction.Commit ();
}
catch (exception)
{
transaction.Rollback ();
DeleteStep1Data ();
}
}
}
}
catch (exception)
{
// Log errors
}
}

protected abstract void DeleteStep1Data ();
protected abstract void Transform ();
}

public class variant
{
public int VariantId {get; to adjust; }
public int CategoryId {get; to adjust; }
}

public class VariantRepo
{
public static void UpdateVariantVersion (SqlConnection sqlConnection,
SqlTransaction transaction, int variantId, string version)
{
// save logic here
}
}

public class CategoryRepo
{
public static void UpdateCategoryVariantMapping (SqlConnection sqlConnection,
SqlTransaction transaction, int categoryId, string version)
{
// save logic here
}
}

I have 2 derived types (AggregateCalculator and AdditionCalculator) each with its own implementation of transform and DeleteStep1Data Methods.

public class AggregateCalculator: BaseVariant
{
protected override void DeleteStep1Data () // Does it violate SRP?
{
throw new NotImplementedException ();
}

protected override void Transform ()
{
throw new NotImplementedException ();
}
}

public class AdditionCalculator: BaseVariant
{
protected override void DeleteStep1Data () // Does it violate SRP?
{
throw new NotImplementedException ();
}

protected override void Transform ()
{
throw new NotImplementedException ();
}
}

I feel like that To process Method makes too much work and if it were possible to hide the version-storing logic behind the EntityVersion class with that To process Method just looks.

Step 1 and step 2 are synchronized, so if there is an error in step 2I call that DeleteStep1Data Method for deleting all in stored data Step 1,

Also, I feel like my 2 derived classes AggregateCalculator and AdditionCalculator take more than one responsibility, d. H. perform a transformation and also delete the data stored during the transformation process, although I am not sure if this is true or not.

Is there a way to revise the above code to improve readability and handle SRP?

sharepoint online – hide items in the list based on group membership

I have a list of items in Sharepoint. I want to allow group members to send items to the list, but I just want owners to be able to view the items.

Microsoft has an example of hiding fields in rows based on the row data:

"style": {
"Display": {
"Operator": "?",
"Address": [
      {
        "operator": "==",
        "operands": [
          "@me",
          "[$Assigned_x0020_To.email]"
]},
""
"None"
]}
}

But I want to a) hide whole lines and b) build on the group affiliation instead, and I can not find anything suitable in their sample catalog.

sharepoint online – hide sharing button in the modern command bar

I'm in the process of customizing the modern UI in SharePoint Online for a new project. If this has previously been answered repeatedly, my Google-fu may be disabled.

We've disabled sharing for a site, but the Share button is still displayed when a file is selected. The only option is "people with existing access". This is confusing, though. We want to hide this button all together.

Enter the image description here

It sounds like this is possible in the classic UI, but nothing was found in the modern UI.

I tried to use CSS, which the modern UI does not support. I've also searched for PnP custom actions, but I have not found anything concrete about hiding a built-in button.

All hints, thoughts, links to articles that I have clearly missed … all are welcome.

javascript –abilities.set (& # 39; acceptInsecureCerts & # 39 ;, true) does not hide the warning in Firefox 66

I have the following Selenium automation written in JS and running in Firefox:

  • Open a website, fill in the login details and click on "Login".

If the login is successful, the page redirects to another link.
Then I get a warning and my automation fails:
warning
Here is my code:

const {Builder, By, Key, to} = require (& # 39; Selenium-Webdriver & # 39;);
const firefox = & # 39; firefox & # 39 ;;
const capabilities = required ("Selenium-Webdriver / lib / Capabilities"). Capabilities;

let Skills = Capabilities.firefox ();
skills.set (& # 39; acceptInsecureCerts & # 39 ;, true);
const firefox = & # 39; firefox & # 39 ;;

let driver = new builder ()
.forBrowser (Firefox)
.withcapacities (skills)
.to build();
driver.get (url) .then (startProcess) .catch (finishProcess);

async function startProcess () {
// fillOutUsername ()
// fillOutPassword ()
// clickOnLogin () -> After that I get the warning screen above and can not continue the automation
}

I thought with this line skills.set (& # 39; acceptInsecureCerts & # 39 ;, true); I would get rid of these things, but apparently not, does anyone have any idea how to get rid of this warning screen?

unity – How to show / hide sprites using onMouseDown () in unity2d?

I am currently using unit for a school project and must be able to hide
connect sprites for "extensions". I looked for it all over the internet and seems to find no answer.

Here is the script so far

using System.Collections;
using Systems.Collections.Generic;
using UnityEngine;

[DisallowMultipleComponent]
public class addBlock: MonoBehaviour {

void OnMouseDown ()
{
Debug.log (gameObject.name);
}
}

if someone can help thanks for you help.