NEW – HOT! HOT! L7.TRADE Reviews: SCAM or LEGIT? GAIN MORE 4% DAILY | Proxies-free

⭐⭐⭐L7 Trade is a trading platform that uses STP technology for interfloor trading and auto trade arbitrage. Help users reconcile cross orders between different coin exchanges to make the difference⭐⭐⭐ :
The outstanding features of L7 Trade:
1️⃣This is a FLO trading coin that collectively supports the support of Auto Trade 11 different crypto coins (BTC, ETH, BCH, XRP, LITC, DASH … Atlcoin)
Auto trading profit averages 4% / day.
Each trading session lasts 4-6 hours. (VIP can be shorter)
2️⃣There is a trade mode without using car. Players only need to buy a low floor coin to get the highest possible return on a high floor. Profits can reach more than 4% per session.
3️⃣DO NOT USE MULTIPLE MODELS. (The introduction of 1F represents only 21% of the interest in the system, is very small and insignificant.)
4️⃣Withdraw capital and interest at any time
5️⃣The speed of the L7 DRIVE / DRAW coin is the same as Binance's.
6️⃣Each user may only use 1 account. When the recognition of the discourse is blocked. (Russian hacker has IP testing technologies, cookies, machine code and AI of user behavior, account upload, payout …)
7️⃣Limit the number of coins with unconfirmed accounts : p Posted on Categories ArticlesTags , , , , , , ,

Azure – Hot Layer BLOB write source

Gentlemen, how are you?

In my Azure account, a high usage of "Hot-LRS writes – multi-level block blob – 192% 1.92 / 1 10 KB" is displayed:

Enter image description here

In the last 3 days, this number, which has never exceeded 0%, has grown exponentially, and I want to understand the origin, but can not identify myself.

I've checked in the upload sections of my application and found that all blobs are cold-layered with the Microsoft Azure Storage Explorer tool. No hot-layer recording was performed.

What I did differently in the last few days:

  1. Enable slow query logs in MySQL
  2. In my web application, I have cached files with the memory allocated in the service plan.
  3. I've activated some WebJobs that just go to my app and do not mess around with saving such things
  4. I have 4 web apps in the same service plan, only 1 has logging enabled and logging is stored in the file system.

In terms of the storage account, I evaluated the logs and logs that match the logs generated by my system in Cold Layer. Below are usage metrics for storage accounts.

Using the storage account, Dialing on the 15th, when the second cost report was high in write consumption

Day 16, according to cost analysis, was when there was a high collection volume, but from here I can not know where and from what source this volume of operations took place since, as I understood, according to the previous usage table on day 16, almost no operations took place. Recording time over the entire period.

Where can I identify these operations? because on the 16th there are no blob logs:

Enter image description here

Enter image description here

Repair – Can I fix the Nikon D500 AF button with hot glue?

The AF-On button of my Nikon D500 camera jumped out of the camera yesterday. It still works if I hold it with a finger and click, but I can not really shoot while holding it all the time.

Can I safely put a small amount of hot glue into the button tip and try to replace it? I really do not know how to fix it, and tomorrow morning I need the camera. = (

Here is a picture of the button
inside button

repair – Can I fix nikon's d500 AF button with hot glue?

The AF-On button of my Nikon D500 camera jumped out of the camera yesterday. It still works if I hold it with a finger and click, but I can not really shoot while holding it all the time.

Here is a picture of the button

Can I safely put a small amount of hot glue into the button tip and try to replace it? I really do not know how to fix it, and tomorrow morning I need the camera. = (

Web Hosting – Does the Meta Tag No Referrer affect the way HTAccess redirects and the Hot Link Prevention process are performed?

I'm trying to understand why the no-referrer meta tag affects redirection and hot link protection in an HTAccess file in a shared hosting environment on LiteSpeed.

For a few days, host support was unable to receive redirect or hot link prevention for both to work simultaneously. If the redirection works, any site can link the files directly. If hotlink prevention worked, either the redirect does not work or the site can not access its own files.

There are three domain names, name_1.org (the primary domain of the account), name_1.com, and name_2.com. The latter two domains are set up as add-on domains on the primary account. All three will be redirected to https://www.name_2.name_1.org, regardless of whether they were entered with or without www.

The host support claims that the problem lies with my placement in the head of the html files. I have to admit that the removal causes the redirect and the hot link protection to work together. For me, however, it makes no sense why the information affects the reference to either of these two points.

I've created a local HTML page and put the same meta tag in the header and the equivalent in a link to the site files and a link to the site pages, using one of the URLs that need to be redirected. and everything works fine. The redirection takes place and the files can not be linked by hotlink.

Is there a reason why the referrer would influence these elements? The redirect and hot link code from the htaccess files is listed below. This htaccess file is located in the public_html directory and in the second block under the public_html / name_2 directory. It looks too messy for me, but I'm pretty new to this area.

Many thanks.

RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^name_1.org$ (OR)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.name_1.org$
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^name_1.org$ (OR)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.name_1.org$ (OR)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^name_1.com$ (OR)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.name_1.com$ (OR)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^name_2.com$ (OR)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.name_2.com$
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/.well-known/acme-challenge/(0-9a-zA-Z_-)+$
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/.well-known/cpanel-dcv/(0-9a-zA-Z_-)+$
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/.well-known/pki-validation/(?: Ballot169)?
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/.well-known/pki-validation/(A-F0-9){32}.txt(?: Sectigo DCV)?$
RewriteRule ^/?$ "https://www.name_2.name_1.org" (R=301,L)

RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://name_2.com/.*$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://name_2.com$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://name_2.name_1.org/.*$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://name_2.name_1.org$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://name_1.com/.*$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://name_1.com$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://name_1.org/.*$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://name_1.org$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://name_1.name_1.org/.*$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://name_1.name_1.org$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://www.name_2.com/.*$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://www.name_2.com$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://www.name_2.name_1.org/.*$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://www.name_2.name_1.org$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://www.name_1.com/.*$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://www.name_1.com$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://www.name_1.org/.*$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://www.name_1.org$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://www.name_1.name_1.org/.*$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://www.name_1.name_1.org$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^https://name_2.com/.*$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^https://name_2.com$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^https://name_2.name_1.org/.*$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^https://name_2.name_1.org$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^https://name_1.com/.*$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^https://name_1.com$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^https://name_1.org/.*$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^https://name_1.org$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^https://name_1.name_1.org/.*$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^https://name_1.name_1.org$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^https://www.name_2.com/.*$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^https://www.name_2.com$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^https://www.name_2.name_1.org/.*$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^https://www.name_2.name_1.org$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^https://www.name_1.com/.*$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^https://www.name1.com$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^https://www.name_1.org/.*$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^https://www.name_1.org$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^https://www.name_1.name_1.org/.*$      (NC)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^https://www.name_1.name_1.org$      (NC)
RewriteRule .*.(jpg|jpeg|gif|png|bmp)$ - (F,NC)

In public_html / name_2, this code appears first and then a repeat of the hot_linking prevention code from the top.

RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/.well-known/acme-challenge/(0-9a-zA-Z_-)+$
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/.well-known/cpanel-dcv/(0-9a-zA-Z_-)+$
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/.well-known/pki-validation/(?: Ballot169)?
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/.well-known/pki-validation/(A-F0-9){32}.txt(?: Sectigo DCV)?$
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^name_2.com$ (OR)
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.name_2.com$
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/.well-known/acme-challenge/(0-9a-zA-Z_-)+$
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/.well-known/cpanel-dcv/(0-9a-zA-Z_-)+$
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/.well-known/pki-validation/(?: Ballot169)?
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/.well-known/pki-validation/(A-F0-9){32}.txt(?: Sectigo DCV)?$
RewriteRule ^/?$ "https://www.name_2.name_1.org  " (R=301,L)

Would Proxying a Lightning Hot Wallet with a Lightning Cold Wallet Increase the Security of the Hot Wallet?

(Edit: I realize how Mt.Gox-y sounds like the setup below, but I come from a "lightning routing problem perspective", not necessarily from a "bitcoin security perspective" … though .. These two things are quite overlapping.)

The setup / problem:
I have two lightning nodes: (A) a Casa Lightning node ("Casa Node") that I trust, and (B) a BTCPayServer Lightning Hot Wallet ("Hot Wallet Node").

With BTCpayServer, it's REALLY easy to integrate a BTC and Lightning payment pipeline into my website. However, a warning is displayed on the BTCpay website that the Lightning wallet is a hot wallet. Uncertain (ish) 🙁

I want to use my Casa node with BTCpayServer, but they do not yet have this functionality (casa). I do not just want to put thousands of dollars into my BTCpay LN hot wallet because I do not trust her. Consider the casa node = trusted node and the hot wallet = less trusted node.

A possible solution?
Got this idea: Use my Casa node as my primary routing node for payments from strangers / customers, and have only one channel between my Casa node and my Hot Wallet node. So all the LNpayment requirements that are generated by the Hot Wallet node When I'm routed through the Casa node, I can easily balance the Casa / HotWallet channel balance if necessary (at the end of the day the credit back to the Casa -Knot and close this a channel in the chain).

Process example:

  • CasaNode = CN
  • BTCPAY Hot-Wallet = HWN
  • Other nodes trying to pay HWN = L1, L2, L3

Step 1: Set up my website with the BTCPay server and enable HWN for the Lightning payment pipeline. (Suppose my site is CatToys.info and I sell four different items worth $ 25.)

step 2: Create a large LN channel between my CN (safer) and HWN (less secure storefront node). For example, create a $ 1,000 payment channel between my Casa Node and the BTCPay Lightning Hot Wallet Node.

step 3: Create a series of random payment channels between CN and other major nodes in the Lightning network. These random payment channels increase the likelihood that a redirect path will be found between the LN node of a particular Web site customer and the HWN node that generated the LN request (eg, the BTCpay server that generates the flash payment request).

Step 4: Random customer scans CatToys.info and checks out, which causes BTCPayserver to generate a $ 25 lightning request via the HWN node.

Step 5: The customer uses his Lightning Node (L1) to pay HWN … the routing is as follows:

  • $ 25 (in BTC) from L1 -> CN -> HWN.

Other customers use the same procedure:

  • $ 25 (in BTC) From L2 -> CN -> HWN
  • $ 25 (in BTC) From L3 -> CN -> HWN

Step 6At the end of the day, HWN has $ 75 (out of the three customers who each pay 25 for a cat toy). If I want to "shut down" the store (which can only be said but must stay with me), I shift all monies from the CN HWN channel back to CN, so the full $ 1000 back on CN (ie $ Move back to CN), then close the channel in the chain.

Step 7If I need to "open" the store for the next day, I just have to recreate a single channel from CN — HWN, which is cheap because only a single channel can be opened and CN is ready (always connect to make many nodes (and CN is trusted).

This approach would: Let me use the hot wallet of the BTCPay server (or a wallet I do not trust too much) for bigger money and give instant liquidity to my hot wallet channel by connecting with CN and I just have to Taking care of opening / realigning a single lightning payment channel between CN —- HWN, rather than trying to constantly open channels with different funding amounts to activate my website for receiving flash payments.

Thoughts? Would the above sequence work in the flash network? And be sure, and payments would actually be successfully redirected to the site, okay?

Any input grateful, thanks.

Hot clips are constantly revealed in Vietnam. Be careful when editing smartphones

The locksmith of the Dragon Temple asked for a password when he received a vertical customer. The password used for business card steps and the potential risk of revealing sensitive information.
"At the time of the repair of the phone, the most minded dead user who is very cautious about the confidentiality of his expression," Le Khanh – the first owner of the store, who beautifies the phone in confusing ways, District 10 (HCMC) – determined. Sewing machine 7

According to Mr. Khanh, the phone repairer of the Temple of the Dragon asked for the password to accept the guest speech. "Passwords used for extensive work, dragon temples are steps to check functions, store batteries, hardware … iPhone coins and software-related illnesses close on iCloud accounts," Khanh said.

However, users are less interested in the security of confidential information to give employees a password.
"Due to the many forms, the manual machines of the workshops access the material of the essential spirit that is sensitive to the user's ink, but without the school the" hot "clip card had leaked out after the host computer gave the mechanic the Password, "Khanh added.

According to Khanh, users need to take the following steps to protect themselves from the situation that they are unwilling to give people a password:

HDMI – 2018 Macbook Air hot / slow when using a UHD monitor

So I upgraded from a 1080p 27 inch monitor to the following ones

Samsung 32 "UHD 4K monitor
Model: LU32J590UQNXZA

I tried to connect via HDMI to a USB C-Dock and Displayport to a Displayport-to-USB C-Cable.

In either case, when I am doing some graphics intensive or even in a video call, my laptop quickly gets hot and starts to stutter, until the mouse and keyboard hesitate.

All I read is that the new MacBook Air should be able to handle a 4K monitor. I usually needed more screen space, not so much high resolution.

Do I expect too much from integrated graphics? I do not expect a game on this laptop, but video calls are no longer functional. When I use Affinity Photo, it also stops squealing with small pictures.