dnd 5e – Does a barbarian's anger end when he attacks an illusion?

RAW, yes.

An illusion is not a creature. The rule is clear that Bobby must attack or take damage to an enemy creature to maintain his anger.

Spirit of the rule

If Bobby doesn't know that what he's attacking is an illusion and not an enemy creature, how does that differ from Bobby's view of actually attacking an enemy creature? If he learns that what he just attacked is not what he attacked, it should increase Bobby's anger. As a DM, I would say that attacking an illusion that the barbarian considers an enemy creature is enough to maintain the barbarian's anger.

dnd 5e – Can Programmed Illusion react to its environment or does it have to do the same thing every time?

Programmed Illusion:

They create an illusion of an object, creature, or other visible phenomenon in range that activates when a particular state occurs. The illusion is not perceptible until then. It can not be bigger than a 30-foot cube, and You decide when to cast the spell, how the illusion behaves and what sounds it makes. This Script Performance can take up to 5 minutes.
When the condition you specify arises, the illusion and performs in the manner described by you, Once the illusion is complete, it disappears and remains inactive for 10 minutes. After this time, the illusion can be reactivated.
The trigger condition can be as general or detailed as you like. However, it must be based on visual or acoustic conditions that occur within a range of 30 feet. For example, you could create an illusion of yourself to warn others who are trying to open an enclosed door, or you could set the illusion to trigger only when a creature says the right word or phrase ,
The physical interaction with the image reveals that it is an illusion because things can go through it. A creature that examines the image based on its action may find that it is an illusion that performs a successful intelligence check (examination) on your spell defense. When a creature recognizes the illusion of what it is, the creature can see through the image, and any sound it makes sounds hollow to the creature.

I suppose that's really what the script's description of scripting means. Is this a scriptwriting script that literally lists from start to finish, no matter how it is triggered? Or is it a script in the sense of a bash script, in which parameters can be specified so that they can react to the environment? Can you talk to this illusion? Can you relate to the weather or the time of day?

The interpretation of Thespian is supported by the fact that it is a "performance".

The computational interpretation is supported by the fact that the spell is called "programmed illusion". Also the main Spell is able to talk, so it seems stupid not to let it happen programmed illusion to do that too.

My instinct is that the spell would be different if it could react to the environment, but I'm not sure.

Which is it?

dnd 5e – Can Deck of Illusion illusions perform harmless acts?

Most likely, Charm Person would not work because it could be considered a harmful effect, but honestly, the magical item is quite poorly advertised because the created creatures are an illusion, but appear "real" of the appropriate size, and behave as if it were a real creature, only that it can not do any harm. "

This kind of implies that it could do useful things, like pushing you out of the way or healing you when the illusion is that of a priest, but these are effects that only real creatures can do, and any physical interaction with them Illusion reveals it as one. I personally believe that the words "appear real" and "as if" strongly imply that these are illusions that behave as if they were real but have no "real" effects.

It is up to your DM to clarify what they can and can not do, because the description of the object has in defining whether it is an illusion or a revealed illusion that can actually cause things like the working of helpful spells , done a pretty bad job.

My personal interpretation as a DM would be that the "creatures" summoned by the cards are pure illusions that can not influence the world in any way, and even though they may look like Charm Person to you nothing happens. That does not mean that you automatically know that the creature is an illusion. However, it may simply mean that you come to the conclusion that something has worked for you and that it has not worked.

Spells – Can I create a wall with Minor Illusion, hide behind it, and attack with advantage?

Can you hide behind the illusion? Probably. Can you gain an advantage just because you are behind it? Probably not if you are not a halfling.

Here's the problem, ultimately you are just Creating a 5 & # 39; dice. That's probably not enough to hide without an actual stealth check.

Basically, you have to completely block the line of sight of the creature you want to exploit for yourself. You also have to be theoretical care for said blocking the line of sight to your opponent until the moment you attack …

Like that probably works best if you are a halfling and have done so in the last round. Then you could retire and shoot with advantage through the illusion.

For a character of normal size, without an action to hide, I probably would not allow you to get behind the illusion of LOS (that does not mean it's not blocked). Most characters are over 5 "tall (a enormously People are probably 80% or more and probably even more adventurous people). This means that even though you only record a 5-foot dice in the field, you will be seen above an illusory one. They would get cover … but the thing is an illusion. So if you're shot at, the creature would look as though you had cover, but none would be applied to the attack (or maybe half of the cover count, -1 or -2 instead of -2 / -5). Advantage for you attacks, but not so much.

However, if you are prepared to perform the action (to perform a stealth check) for hiding, I would acknowledge this because you are actually doing a whole action and may be sitting behind an illusory object.

So yes, the wall is opaque and you could hide behind it / benefit from attacks (technically, if it were a real object, they could not attack you, I would allow you to attack) … but only if They are completely behind it, and that's not the case with most PCs.

dnd 3.5e – Does the Illusion spell "Legion of Sentinels" work on Oozes?

Ben's answer is pretty good and the conclusion that slashing brown pudding will not work is just right.

He is also right that thoughtlessness is not a defense here. Mindlessness only protects against spells that invade your mind (with the mind-affecting tag). Most illusions do not do it. Most illusions actually create a real, physical effect, be it light or sound or whatever. A thoughtless creature will experience these lights or sounds as well as the lights or sounds of real objects, and being thoughtless is probably even more prone to fools, as they can not argue that something can not be real.

But what I really wanted to address is blind-but-blindsight. Illusion spells can create sounds, vibrations (which are just sounds with a different name anyway), smells, and so on. That is, it is quite plausible for "a non-visual sense (or a combination of such senses)". [used] working effectively without seeing ", to be fooled by an illusion magic.

In addition, illusion spells (shadow spells) are partially real and are created from the shadow material of the shadow layer. It is not different Wall of stone When you summon a stone from the Earth plane, it is only classified as part of the Illusion School instead of the Summoning School because … it is. This classification makes sense for arcane scholars in the world. Perhaps the level of the shadow has some connection to illusory magic, perhaps it is only taught as part of the standard illusion curriculum, not as a standard sorcerer's curriculum. We do not know and it does not matter to us. The point is that shadow magic, though illusory, is at least partially real.

Whatever means "non-visual sense (or a combination of senses)" the mud uses, he will still recognize Legion of Sentinels because the legionnaires are actually here to discover. They have volume, and probably even mass, there are fixed boundaries between the sentinel and the air in which they exist, and they create vibrations and possibly even odors.

In short, a spell of illusion (shadow) should work on creatures that are blind but blind.

This does not change the fact that the Sentinels cause damage, which is not helpful anyway.

dnd 5e – If I animate a corpse made real by the Illusory Reality ability, will it become an illusion after 1 minute?

To better explain my question, the process as such follows step by step (assuming the caster is able to cast and use all proposed abilities):

  • Wizard works main to create a corpse on the ground.
  • Spellcaster uses Illusory Reality as a bonus action to make the corpse real.
  • Wizard works Animate dead on the corpse.

Here is the suggested question. Illusory reality lasts only a minute. Does the creature remain undead, or does it become an illusion after a minute has passed and I have not left it as it was?

Please quote sources and keep your answer / interpretation RAW.

Is a keyword with low competition and high search volume just an illusion or a reality?

Hello webmasters !! Hope you guys are doing very well !! From the last two months, I'm thinking about starting a new blog on the home improvement or health and fitness category! Thousands of results came up when I searched for ideas on Google at Google, and almost everyone suggested I find a keyword with "high search volume" and "low" competition for it to rank quickly. I've obeyed almost everyone, but when I started doing keyword research on different keywords for home improvement and health and fitness niches in the Google Keyword Planner and some other tools on the Internet, I did not find any of those keywords that did not Competition and a high search volume has !! It will be a great help to me if you help me to answer the following questions.

1: Is there a way to find keywords with low competition, high search volume, and high CPC for earning?

2: Can I take the risk of working on competitive keywords? Is my time worth it? Will they rank for subdomain of Blogspot or WordPress

3: Which category is cheaper when it comes to making money from blogs? Health or fitness or home improvement.
SEMrush

4: Is Micro Niche Blogging Better Than Niche Blogging? and require less work for ranking purposes

greetings
A digital enthusiast

dnd 5e – Can a creature of the illusory nature of an illusion be so sure that it does not have to spend its act on it to investigate or deal with it?

I specifically ask about the many spells that contain the following text or something similar:

When a creature uses its action to investigate [illusion]The creature can see that it is an illusion, with a successful Intelligence (Investigation) test against your Magic Savings DC.

The RAW answer seems to be no, even considering the misleading effects.

A creature can be sure that what it perceives is an illusion. However, the illusion does not seem weak if it is not interacted with or examined. It does not seem to me that just a mere observation of an illusion and its derivation, no matter how safe a creature may be, is the interaction with it, or (especially important in combat), this means an investigation with an action. This creature would still need to check its certainty at some level by doing one of the previous things,

There is an inherent insecurity factor in illusions, no matter how positive a creature is about the true nature of a particular illusion. To be "sure" of an illusion and to be suspicious of a particular person does not seem to be enough to establish that the illusion is wrong and to get through.

Am I right? (For connoisseurs, should I post this in response to my own question, or is this appropriate?)


https://rpg.stackexchange.com/a/86921/49864

May be related. This answerer suggests that a spell caster does not have to interact with or examine his own illusion to see through it. There are some ridiculous conclusions that can be drawn from the fact that an illusionist is in some ways prone to his own spells. Maybe it will be enough to create an illusion to show it to the wizard as a fake.

Note that the accepted answer implies a caster can actually be vulnerable to his own illusions, I digress.


Does Minor Illusion break only when someone performs an action to investigate?

Although this question and its accepted answer do not exactly go into what I am asking for, only the intention of interacting with an illusion is required.