Passwords – ODM perfume stand

Product description
Material acrylic
Size adjusted as needed
Thickness can be specified
ColorClear, White, Black or Custom
LogoSilk screen or digital print or custom
MOQ 200 pieces
Price itemEXW, FOB, CNF, CIF, FCA
Payment Terms30% T / T in advance, balance before shipment. Western Union, T / T, L / C
Shipping by express, by sea, by air
Delivery time3-5 days for sample, 15-20 days for mass production
Sample time3-5 days
1. Professional design team can create drawings or design appropriate styles for you.
2. Qualified craftsmen / employees and QC control team can guarantee perfect quality.
3. Acrylic material is environmental friendly material, we use high quality food grade acrylic material.
Feature1.High quality acrylic material.
2. advanced equipment and machinery.
3. Different specifications and colors are available.
4.With best quality and competitive price.
5.We can make acrylic products as your designs.
6. We can print your LOGO on products.
Advantages of acrylic
1. Impact resistance, acrylic is 200 times stronger than glass, hardly breaks.
2. Translucency, acrylic is 98% transparent and highly crystalline.
3. corrosion resistance
4. Resistance to burning, acrylic does not burn.
5. Acrylic is non-toxic and environmentally friendly.
6. Acrylic products are widely used in all areas of our lives.
7. Each shape is available for its plasticity.
8. Acrylic products are durable and look great.
9. Acrylic products are very easy to clean.

We can do this for you as well:
Acrylic Cosmetic Display Acrylic Nail Polish Display Acrylic Watches & Glasses Display Acrylic Jewelry Display
Acrylic Wall Clock Acrylic Brochure & Brochure Holder Acrylic Table Tent & Menu Holder Acrylic Trophy & Awards
Acrylic Picture FramesAcrylic Digital Products DisplayAcrylic Cigarette and Wine DisplayAcrylic Food Display & Trays
Acrylic Boxes & CasesAcrylic Floor DisplayAcrylic Office SuppliesAcrylic LED Display
Acrylic Home & Hotel DecorationAcrylic Gift & AccessoriesAcrylic CalendarAcrylic Business Card HolderODM Perfume Stand
Website: http: //

Authentication – sending passwords remotely

First of all, I hope you have set up your credentials so that the user MUST log them in at first log in so that users can not remember them.

If a remote office has a trusted administrator, send this administrator an encrypted set of keys / passwords that you share with other users. So you can simply ask them to use the password 12 for the first login.

Depending on your threat model (worried about national actors, ie working with a foreign office in country 4 that may possibly be espioning for your local competitors), this is actually a classic case where you can call someone from the fixed line a great solution.

Just call someone from the landline and give him the first credentials over the phone, works very well.

Moreover, GPG is always a classic method, as many responded. In this answer to you will find examples of using both public keys and the safer than standard symmetric usage.

Depending on your legal requirements, OTR is a method of encrypting communications, especially IMs (see Pidgin for an example), which also allows shared secret authentication. You can share an easy-to-use password on the phone while you're chatting to review the IM session, no middle-aged man, or some aspect of the job they do and it's hard for someone to understand is of.

If you already have a way to send e-mails that you can trust only to your recipient and your own network / e-mail administrators, and you can trust other products / companies, you can send a "secure e-mail "Service like the Cisco Registered Envelope Service or an alternative.

Especially with SSH keys or extremely long and difficult passwords, you can use a combination of them. You can encrypt using a secure password, for example using GPG symmetric mode (see link above), and then pass this password over the phone or other method to decrypt the actual authentication token / SSH key / certificate / etc can be.

Authentication – Is hash without salt safe for random passwords?

I design an API with token authentication.

I do not want to save tokens as plain text in the database. For the same reason, user passwords are not stored as plain text: if the database is compromised, the attacker should not be able to extract any usable tokens from them.

My current plan is to generate 40-character tokens:

  • The first 20 characters would be the token "ID" (the primary key in the database).
  • the next 20 characters would be the token "password"

When generating the token, I would send the full token to the client and store it in my database:

  • the token ID
  • a SHA1 hash of the token password

In this way, my database contains only half of the actual token sent to the client and can only check tokens, not retrieve.

I do not plan to add a salt: As far as I understand, the purpose of salt is to prevent hash attacks / rainbow table attacks that are commonly used, or short passwords. In my case, however, passwords are completely random, with enough entropy (67 possible characters, 20 characters in length = 4) × 1036 Combinations). If I did not miss anything, adding a salt in this case would be the same as creating a longer random password.

Likewise, I do not plan to use an expensive hashing technique like BcryptThat would be too expensive: Unlike user authentication, where the user authenticates once and then receives a session ID, the token is the only authentication method sent on every single API call. A 50ms hash method is simply not acceptable here. I do not think that an expensive hashing technique is especially safe for the same reason explained in the previous point: the password is arbitrary with enough entropy. Even with a powerful hash machine, it would take billions of years to become bruteforce.

Is there a mistake in my approach?

The only thing I can think about (assuming someone gets access to the database!) Is when a vulnerability is found in SHA1, so it becomes possible to find an input indicating a particular hash as the output (this is at MD5 somehow the case, I heard). But I think that's the same for every hashing algorithm, including Bcrypt.

How do iOS apps store passwords after they have been removed without using iCloud?

The following is a real example – I am not an iOS developer and am trying to understand how this can be possible:

  1. Create a new Google trial account and then create an Apple test ID

  2. Set up an iOS device. If you are prompted to enter details about signing in to an Apple ID, skip this option

  3. When you get to Springboard, start the App Store and look for "Assistant." Touch the "Retrieve" button. You will then be prompted to sign in to the iTunes Store. Enter the details for the Apple ID you just created. From this point on, the download of the app begins. Please be aware that we have not signed up with iCloud and that we have just signed in to the iTunes Store to download the app

  4. After downloading, start the app and, when prompted to sign in, enter the details for the new Google Account (created in step 1). You should now be logged in to the Assistant app

  5. Go back to the home screen and remove the wizard app. When prompted, confirm when it is removed from the device

  6. Now go back to the App Store and search for "Gmail." Select this option to download – you should not be prompted to sign in to an Apple ID because iOS saved the details when you downloaded the wizard

  7. Launch the app and tap the Sign In button. Note that the previously entered Google Account is listed. This is the same as signing in to Assistant. If you tap this account, you'll be able to access Gmail with this information without being prompted to enter a password of any kind

For me, the most interesting aspect is that the details of the Google Account entered into the app before uninstalling are saved even after the Assistant App has been removed. I could not figure out how to do that. It can not be iCloud (because it was not enabled at the time of initial installation of Assistant). Does anyone know how it's possible for another app, even after an app has been uninstalled, to read data previously written to memory by a separate app?

Thanks for your time.

Security – Where can third-party application passwords be stored in Drupal 8?

I've written a custom Drupal 8 module that communicates with third-party APIs that require authentication. I have a username and password for the APIs I need to store somewhere. I can think of the following two ways to accomplish this.

  1. I can save the credentials as a configuration in the Drupal database. However, the password will then be visible in plain text to all site administrators, and we do not want all site administrators to see the password specific configuration for all site administrators, but the password is still stored in plain text in the database.

  2. I can also save the credentials in the settings.php file.

Is there another way to store these credentials? What is the best, most secure and preferred way to store credentials for third-party accounts in Drupal 8?

Do encryption and encryption schemes make passwords secure?

I've recently come across a technician who recommends a user to use a plaintext of his choice, guide him through one of these ciphers, convert him to Base64, and then use the result as his main password on LastPass.

However, the simple nature of ciphers and encoding schemes like Base64 and the ease with which a system could be trained for it make me wonder if this is not a form of security.

How much safer is this approach compared to using a long plain text master password? Is it a good or bad safety practice? Are there likely to be hackers who make the decoding of basic ciphers and coding schemes part of their brute-forcing strategy?

Passwords – Specify the number of characters for crunch

I am sure that these questions come up frequently, but I can not find anyone who does what I am looking for.
So I'm trying to use crunch to generate a word list with specific sets of each character type, d. H. 2 numbers, 1 symbol, 3 uppercase letters, 1 lowercase letter, etc.
There is isd that seems to be doing what I can not, but it is for consecutive duplicates, which I do not want.
The characters can be anywhere in the string, but there must be at least the specified number of each type.
Is that possible?