raw – Why did I lose my NEF files, and could only find small JPEGs in their place in the Recycle Bin?

raw – Why did I lose my NEF files, and could only find small JPEGs in their place in the Recycle Bin? – Photography Stack Exchange

usability – Is it good practice to place tabs at the same level when search is the main feature? How to deal with spacing?

There are two potential approaches, but you have to have a consistent design approach/philosophy if you want to achieve the best user experience.

The search feature, if applied globally to the application, should sit at a level above the tabs so that the user isn’t confused about whether the search results relate to the contents in the tabs or not.

However, if the search feature only retrieves results relating to what is in the tabs, then it can also make sense for it to sit in the same level, provided that you can manage the spacing. This can be done by common strategies used in browsers to manage tabs (when you have too many to fit on the screen, especially in devices with narrow widths) or create a more compact search call-to-action (e.g. icon that expands when clicked and collapses when not in use).

vanitygen – How do extremely difficult vanity addresses get found in the first place?

Funds are spendable by public keys and addresses contain public key hashes. Vanity addresses are created by hashing lots of public keys until the hash is in an expected range. What you mentioned is an example of a burn address, not a vanity address. Burn addresses are crafted by manually editing the public key hash with a specific the corresponding address in mind. Burn addresses do have corresponding public key(s), but since we it is impossible to find the public key from the public key hash, burn addresses cannot spend their funds. They are similar to addresses whose owners mistakenly deleted their wallets, where the funds are in a locked state.

The last digits of burn addresses is random is because addresses also contain a checksum which is the hash of everything else encoded in the address.

Filter a Linked List in Place in C

I have created the following function which filters a linked list in place
(here it removes all instances of the element k), but it could easily be modified to take a function pointer as an argument and filter on something else.

Any ideas on how to improve the code?

typedef struct list_integer {
    type value;
    struct list_integer *next;
} list_integer;

list_integer *removeKFromList(list_integer * l, int k)
{

    if (!l)
    return l;
    while (l && l->value == k)
    l = l->next;
    if (!l)
    return l;


    list_integer *p = l;
    list_integer *q = l->next;

  scan_in:
    if (q) {
    if (q->value != k) {
        list_integer *t = q;
        q = q->next;
        p = t;
        goto scan_in;
    } else {
        goto scan_out;
    }
    }

  scan_out:
    if (q) {
    if (q->value != k) {
        p->next = q;
        p = q;
        q = q->next;
        goto scan_in;
    } else {
        q = q->next;
        goto scan_out;
    }
    } else {
    p->next = q;
    }
    return l;

}

```

Creating/dropping MySQL users using “IF NOT EXISTS” when row based replication is in place

I’d like to know the affect of using “IF NOT EXISTS” when creating or dropping users when row based replication is being used to replicate data to a mysql slave. I know that in the past I have broken replication by creating or dropping users that already existed (or didn’t exist) on the slave, even though row based replication was being used. It seems that the user table isn’t replicated in a row based fashion even though the database itself is. Would adding “if not exists” to my create or drop statements prevent me from breaking replication in the future?

business application – baccarat is intended for players who prefer to place

This is the favorite game of James Bond; baccarat is intended for players who prefer to place high stakes. Taking into account the great popularity, the popular majority of online gambling halls allow all players to play baccarat and alter stake rates as they wish. Thus, the user can play with the rates that he can afford. 라이브카지노

international travel – Best place to stay in New York

international travel – Best place to stay in New York – Travel Stack Exchange

google sheets – Divide data evenly in row, place in additional rows

Okay, so what I have presented is a random divisor for every number. If you want all the rows in a column to add up, it will not be a random number. for instance, if you want to have 4 rows, the number in which you will use as a divisor will be 4. This is unless you are referring to the average of the random divisors to equal 4… or however that really works. The point is, choosing a random number between 4 and 7 will not have the summation results in which you are looking for.

    function myFunction() {
  var ss = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet().getActiveSheet();
  var data = ss.getDataRange().getValues();
  var newData = ((,,,,,));
  var i = 0;
  var j = 0;
  var k = 1;
  var random = ();
  for (var i = 0, dataLength = data.length; i < dataLength; i++) {
    for (k = 1; k < 6; k++) {
    random(k) = Math.floor(Math.random() * 7) + 4;
    }
    newData(j) = (data(i)(0) / random(1),data(i)(1) / random(2),data(i)(2) / random(3),data(i)(3) / random(4),data(i)(4) / random(5),data(i)(5));
    for (k = 1; k < 6; k++) {
      random(k) = Math.floor(Math.random() * 7) + 4;
    }
    newData(j+1) = (data(i)(0) / random(1),data(i)(1) / random(2),data(i)(2) / random(3),data(i)(3) / random(4),data(i)(4) / random(5),data(i)(5));
    for (k = 1; k < 6; k++) {
      random(k) = Math.floor(Math.random() * 7) + 4;
    }
    newData(j+2) = (data(i)(0) / random(1),data(i)(1) / random(2),data(i)(2) / random(3),data(i)(3) / random(4),data(i)(4) / random(5),data(i)(5));
    for (k = 1; k < 6; k++) {
      random(k) = Math.floor(Math.random() * 7) + 4;
    }
    newData(j+3) = (data(i)(0) / random(1),data(i)(1) / random(2),data(i)(2) / random(3),data(i)(3) / random(4),data(i)(4) / random(5),data(i)(5));
    j = j + 4
  }
  ss.getRange(1,1, newData.length,6).setValues(newData);
}

magento2 – Loading icon for literally MINUTES after pressing Place Order – Magento 2.3.5

Magento 2.3.5 site that loads pretty quickly generally, checkout maybe a few seconds to load but that seems par for the course for Magento 2

However, the issue is that after pressing ‘Place Order’ the loading icon literally shows for 2-3 minutes before loading the success page.

This happens if using OneStepCheckout, the default one page checkout or regular checkout and using Braintree or Cash On Delivery plugin. The only shipping method is ‘Free’

What I have noticed is that we get an order confirmation email fairly quickly (15-20 seconds) and then an invoice always arrives exactly 2 minutes after the order confirmation – and it is after this that the success page loads.

We don’t need the invoice to be sent automatically, and I guess this is contributing to the excessive load time – is there any way of stopping this?

Any other ideas for what could be causing this ridiculous load time? I’ve checked debug.log / system.log while it’s happening and literally nothing shows

DreamProxies - Cheapest USA Elite Private Proxies 100 Private Proxies 200 Private Proxies 400 Private Proxies 1000 Private Proxies 2000 Private Proxies ExtraProxies.com - Buy Cheap Private Proxies Buy 50 Private Proxies Buy 100 Private Proxies Buy 200 Private Proxies Buy 500 Private Proxies Buy 1000 Private Proxies Buy 2000 Private Proxies ProxiesLive Proxies-free.com New Proxy Lists Every Day Proxies123