Why does WordPress rewrite absolute URLs on the staging site to include the staging prefix when we manually refer them to the live site?

question

What would cause compelling rewrite of absolute URLs on our staging site to point to this staging site, even if they were manually written to target our live site?

workflow

We manually write pages in HTML and CSS on a SiteGround hosted staging site, save our changes, and then test them. We can either write them in the native WordPress editor or in our editor for the theme (TagDiv Composer), and our problem occurs in both cases.

problem

We write a link target as an absolute URL in a page, as in the following example:

"Click here for ours Daily specialties! "

We then save our work in the editor.

If we check the link on the staging site right away, it will already point to it instead and will appear as such when we restart the editor.

Although this does not affect relative URLs (ie. ) affects all prefix variants of absolute URLs.

The site has thousands of absolute URLs that are affected.

What we tried

We have to miss something, so do not hesitate to offer guidance or perspective, regardless of whether it seems superfluous or not.

We tried to check the server, theme and child theme files .htaccess and functions.php in cPanel for code that could cause this (we may have overlooked or misunderstood it?). We also checked that the site URL, etc. in the Settings> General section of the WordPress Dashboard points to the live site without the staging prefix.

Google Sheets – How do I refer to data in a column this month?

In the screenshot below, I'm trying to get B42 to display the value of the cell on line 40 in the column of the current month:

Formula returns N / A

Since the data is generated automatically using a transposition function (Arryaformula), each month is written as dd / mm / yyyy. However, I have formatted it so that only the M and Y show is displayed.

The formula in the bar was picked up by another answer here, but understandably it can not find today's date because each column name is actually the first of each month.

Could someone please help me?

Why should not an event refer to multiple aggregates?

In my experience, event sourcing often states that "an event must belong to an aggregate" and that "an aggregate is your largest transaction limit."

Why is this?

What damage would such events cause:

{
Type: "BoblesSent"
Aggregate: [1, 2].
from 1,
to 2,
Quantity: 420
}

It seems as if it could be atomically recorded, efficiently queried in the reconstruction of just one (an) aggregate, and applied isolated in both push / projection and lazy / reconstruction scenarios.

What is the catch? Is it a matter of performance scalability?

May also be heterogeneous aggregates:

{
Type: "ActivityCreated",
Aggregate: [1, 999].
Customer: 1,
Activity: 999
}

Does the Clinton administration refer to Bill Clinton or Hillary Clinton?

We are having a discussion and the question is, "Compare the Clinton and Obama administration to health care."

I do not know if the question is about Bill Clinton or Hillary Clinton.

Half of the class talked about Hillary Clinton and the other half about Bill Clinton in the discussion.

So when you hear "Clinton Administration," does that refer to Bill Clinton or Hillary Clinton?

I know, I know … stupid question. But I think the question asks about the government under Bill Clinton and not Hillary Clinton. I'm right?

,

Dynamically refer to data in the query in Google Sheets

I have a query in a Google Sheet that is structured as follows:

= QUERY ({IMPORTRANGE (outputs_2018Q4, "DATA_Expenses"); IMPORTRANGE (outputs_2019Q1, "DATA_Expenses"); IMPORTRANGE (outputs_2019Q2, "DATA_Expenses")}, "SELECT * WHERE Colo" = "& ParameterProjectTool" ";)

This query uses three data fields that use IMPORTRANGE. Each section comes from an external sheet and each sheet has a named section named DATA_Expenses.

The formula works well and I get the results as expected and desired.

What I would like to do is to change this section:

{IMPORTRANGE (Expenses_2018Q4, "DATA_Expenses"); IMPORTRANGE (Expenditure_2019Q1, "DATA_Expenses"); IMPORTRANGE (Expenditure_2019Q2, "DATA_Expenses")}

I want a named range to be referenced in the current table, so the formula looks like this:

= QUERY (QUERY_DATA_RANGE, "SELECT * WHERE Col17 =" "& ParamProjectKey &" "ORDER BY Col3, Col4 ASC")

I could create a named cell reference that contains the IMPORTRANGE values ​​exactly as in the original formula, but I can not figure out how to get the QUERY to evaluate them. It appears that the contents of QUERY_DATA_RANGE are passed as a string and not as an evaluated array (if that makes sense). I tried to use ArrayFormula to solve this problem, but so far without success.

Terminology – Does "model" in MVC refer to the class or instance?

In MVC model is the case of course. Model, view, and controllers are objects that communicate with each other within a user interface.

However the word model Is not clear. It is often used to describe domain objects, but this does not always fit with the MVC model.

In the Smalltalk 80 browser (where MVC was developed and used for the first time), the domain objects are the code elements (classes and methods) manipulated through the browser (the Smalltalk IDE before the name IDE was invented) and the model In MVC, an object that retains navigation status, such as For example, the currently selected class and method, and the views (separate windows of the browser) with appropriately selected information provides for display. Subsequent developments resulted in composite MVC models that encapsulated sub-aspects, allowing the reuse of UI parts and plug-in architecture for code tools.

In your example, the Car class is certainly not the model, it may be the instance, but it depends on your application. It can only be a domain object referenced by the MVC model of the application as part of its navigation state.

utm parameter – 301 forwarding not passed refer to GA. Can I use a UTM tracking link in the 301 instead?

I have a link to a site that I manage on a third-party domain.

The link is actually to an old site, which I then become the current site 301.

All websites are http, but somewhere along the route the HTTP reference tag is deleted, so I can not see the referencing website in Google Analytics.

If I used a URL for UTM link tracking as a URL for the 301 redirect, I would be able to see where the Google Analytics visit came from.