Add a new user to a group after registering using a custom registration form

I can find a way to assign a new user to a group after registering. For example, a contributor belongs to group A when they create a subscriber user by using a custom front-end form. The subscriber user is also assigned to group A. I use the group plugin and know it has a short code [group_ join]but how can I add a check for a shortcode after submitting the form? Do you have another suggestion? Many Thanks

Paperwork – When registering with the police, if you are an EU citizen in the Czech Republic, is there a 30-day registration earlier?

https://www.policie.cz/clanek/reporting-of-the-place-of-aliensresidence.aspx states:

An EU citizen is required to report his or her residency within 30 days of entering the territory of the police if his probable stay is longer than 30 days. This obligation also applies to family members of an EU citizen if that EU citizen resides in the territory. The duty to report residence to the police does not apply to a foreigner who has fulfilled this obligation at the tourist accommodation.

Is there an advantage if you register with the police 30 days ago when registering as an EU citizen to visit the Czech Republic?

c # – Registering functions in .Net Core Dependecy Injection automatically

Use of dependency injection in .Net Core. Currently, creating Func <> is not supported for injecting into the constructor, as is the case with other DI containers, and it is not intended to add it soon, if at all.

I wanted to stay away from the Service Locator pattern and continue inserting Funcs where needed. So I wrote an extension method to check the register type constructors and create and register all the required funs.

Public static class ServiceCollectionExtensions
{
/// 
    /// Registers all funcs in constructors at the ServiceCollection - important after all registrations
/// 
    /// 
    
    
    
    /// 
    
    
    
    public static IServiceCollection AddFactories (this IServiceCollection collection)
{
var factories = new hash set();
// Get a list of all registrations that are not factories
var registrations = collection.Where (s => s.ImplementationType! = null);
foreach (var registration in registrations)
{
// Get a list of functions in the constructors
var constructors = registration.ImplementationType.GetConstructors (BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance);
var funcs = constructors.SelectMany (c => c.GetParameters ())
.Select (p => p.ParameterType)
.Where (t => t.IsGenericType && t.GetGenericTypeDefinition () == typeof (Func <>));
foreach (var func in funcs)
{
factories.Add (func);
}
}

// Every function builds the factory for it
foreach (var factory in factories)
{
var type = factory.GetGenericArguments (). First ();
collection.AddTransient (factory, BuildExpression (type));
}

Return collection;
}

/// 
    /// This build expression tree for a function that is equivalent
/// Func <IServiceProvider, Func> factory = serviceProvider => new function(serviceProvider.GetService);
/// 
    /// 
    
    
    
    /// 
    
    
    
    private static function BuildExpression (type)
{
var serviceProvider = Expression.Parameter (typeof (IServiceProvider), "serviceProvider");
var method = typeof (ServiceProviderServiceExtensions)
.GetMethod (nameof (ServiceProviderServiceExtensions.GetService), BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Static)
.MakeGenericMethod (type);
var call = Expression.Call (method, serviceProvider);
var returnType = typeof (Func <>). MakeGenericType (type);
var returnFunc = Expression.Lambda (returnType, call);
var func = Expression.Lambda (typeof (Func<,>) .MakeGenericType (typeof (IServiceProvider), returnType), returnFunc, serviceProvider);
var factory = func.Compile () as a function;
Return factory;
}
}

Look for improvements. It is not certain that it is worthwhile to move the reflection call to find the extension method so that it is not in the loop. Apparently, it would not flow as well if I found it in the calling method and passed it on, or I could create a lazy field for it, but it could also be a micro-optimization, since this code is executed only once during the setup.

A simple test shows it works

public class TestFunc
{

public TestFunc ()
{
Date = DateTime.Now;
}
public DateTime Date {get; }
}


public class HostingFunc
{
private read-only func _Factory;
public HostingFunc (Func Factory)
{
_fabrik = factory;
}

public void TestMethod ()
{
Console.WriteLine (_factory (). Date);
}
}


static void Main (String[] args)
{
var serviceCollection = new ServiceCollection ();
serviceCollection.AddSingleton();
serviceCollection.AddTransient();
serviceCollection.AddFactories ();
var container = serviceCollection.BuildServiceProvider ();

var hostingFunc = container.GetService();
hostingFunc.TestMethod ();
Thread.Sleep (TimeSpan.FromSeconds (2));
hostingFunc.TestMethod (); // Should be different than above
Console.ReadLine ();
}

office 365 – Microsoft Graph API for registering the SharePoint Online App

There are two types of permissions for OAuth "world" (and also in Office 365 Graph).

The first is the authority of your application. This is a set of permissions that you can select during app registration and change in the Azure portal.

The second is the user privilege.

How do they correlate?

It depends on the type of authentication flow you are using.

To the Client credentials Only flow app permissions are used. This type of authentication flow usually involves only ClientId and ClientSecret and does not require any user interaction. It is useful and is usually used for daemon services, scheduled processes, etc. (if there is no user). These types of permissions are called application permissions in the Azure portal.

To the Access code The flow endpoint (in your case, MS Graph) analyzes the effective permissions of your application (you set the permissions on the Azure portal) and your user. For example, if your app has "write permissions" to SharePoint, but your user can only read, an HTTP request with the forbidden response will fail. Because effective permissions are being read (lowest possible between your app and a user). In the Azure portal, these permissions are called delegated permissions

What type of authentication does your app use? I have no experience with Android development, but based on this article and other examples Access code flow. This means that all your http requests to MS Grpah (or whatever other endpoints) are subject to valid permissions between a user who initiated this call and your app.

c – Allows the user to enter letters only when registering.

Condition to receive only letters in this

scanf ("% s", & name);

int check (struct reg list)[]char name[128]) {

int i;
for (i = 0; i <reg_size; i ++) {
if (! strncmp (list[i].name, name, 128))
Return 1;
}
Return 0;
}

Data record invalid (structure list)[5]) {
int i;
for (i = 0; i <5; ++ i)
char name[128];
printf ("enter name:  n");
scanf ("% s", & name);
if (strcmp[i] < '0' || nome[i] >    & # 39; # 9 & 39);
printf ("Enter a valid name");
}
otherwise if (check (list, name)) {
reg_size ++;
list[reg_size-1].id = reg_size;
strcpy[reg_size-1]name, name);
list[reg_size-1].cred = 0.0;
printf (" nuser% s created with id% d  n  n", list[reg_size-1].name, reg_size);
}
otherwise
{
printf (" nName not available  n  n");
}
}

Possibly unfair price for registering a parked domain

I want to create a personal website on a .com domain. My first choice in terms of a domain is just my name (a not very common name). If you enter this URL in my browser, you will get to this parked domain:
Enter the image description here

$ 895 seems to be a bit steeper for a .com domain with no particular relevance, except for the person who happens to be wearing the personal name that is homonymous to that web domain. Am I not up to date with the regular domain prices or is this price actually abusive?

If the latter, then there is another way to obtain this domain than by contacting the owner of this parked domain, or should I simply go to my second preference for domain names (for example, adding the middle initial there, the domain ) for which seems to lead a calmer "ERR_NAME_NOT_RESOLVED" message)?