Google Sites: How to Create Blog Related Websites

I want to create an internal site for my company where we can post articles that can be tagged in multiple categories.

For example, we have two categories, "country" and "topics." An article about branding in Japan is tagged twice in both categories:
– Country = Japan
– Theme = Branding

At the top of the home page (top navigation) are the categories as a menu. At the top is the menu "Country", "Theme". This article is on both sides "Country -> Japan" and "Theme -> Branding".

If it's not clear enough, we'll create a site like this:

Is it possible to create such a website only with Google Sites? Every suggestion will be appreciated, thank you!

8 – How is the image of the related node displayed in the message template?

I have the news module installed on my site. I have created a message template for the new node that was created in my subtopic.

Enter image description here

I want to display the image of the node in the message template with the style diaporama_lg_50,

I tested the following code with TWIG, but it does not work:

{{message.field_node_reference.entity.field_article_image | image_style (& # 39; diaporama_lg_50 & # 39;}}}

Unit Tests – Should tests make a single assertion or are several related claims acceptable?

Each component test should meet a single requirement.

You may not always have to meet formal requirements for each method. Methods are written to meet such formal requirements. But since a method should do only one thing, have a single purpose, you should already have an accurate idea of ​​what you can expect from the method in terms of behavior.

Consider your first example. You can only claim against the entire output (pseudocode follows):

Assert.AreEqual (Result, @ "{
& # 39; status & # 39 ;: XXX,
& # 39; # 39 & data ;: [{
} ");

However, such tests are brittle, and if they break, there is no indication of what went wrong or what requirement is not met. You need to look through the output to see where the real problem is and then analyze the problem to see which requirement is not met.

Confirming a single request means that you can give your component test a meaningful name that specifies exactly which request is being tested. There are different possibilities for this.

Given_UserIsAuthenticated_When_InvalidAccountNumberIsUsedToWithdrawMoney_Then_TransactionWillFail ()  

If the test fails, it will show up in your test runner with the descriptive name and you'll know exactly which request is not met.

Viewing the search result: Viewing fields from various related bundles

I'm trying to display the fields of a content type while searching for a different content type. More precisely … here is my situation:

I have a view based on an index with fields in organism and fields in mRNA.

Content Type: Organism
Fields: order, common name, genus, species

Content type: mRNA
Fields: Description, scientific name (genus species)

I've set up search filters for description, order, common names, and scientific names. The result should look something like this:
Link to the mRNA site
order | scientific name common name

However, when I search for a description, nothing is displayed for the order and the common name. I think this is the result of an outer link between the two content types.

How would I inwardly "connect" the organism by scientific name? I tried to look into the EntityReference module, but it seems I have to manually enter the entity reference for each mRNA page I have … which is not what I want.

Many Thanks

magento2 – Magento 2 – OWL Carousel 2 in related products problem

I'm trying to set up OWL Carousel for related products in Magento 2.

I have overwritten this file: Magento_Catalog / templates / product / list / items.phtml

This is my code:

                                                <div id = "owlslider" class = "Products Wrapper Grid Products-Grid Products-">

But my owl carousel does not show it well, I mean inline. My owl carousel items are now among each other.

Enter image description here

What am I doing wrong?

Thank you in advance.