monitoring – HTTP Health Check for Beanstalk elastic app triggers scaling / capacity rules

I have an Elastic Beanstalk application running a WordPress application, and I want some monitoring and scaling triggers in case the homepage health checker returns an HTTP response code in the range of 4xx and 5xx, I know the watchdog tab and the capacity tab from the configuration section in Elastic Beanstalk. I see there scaling rules and a health check box. Here's the environmental behavior I'm looking for:

Scaling triggers
- Health check - what is that [home page][1]    (/index.php) - Returns a response status code between 4xx and 5xx
- Start a new instance behind the Elastic Load Balancer, which handles web traffic
- In the meantime, divert all traffic to the maintenance side
- If within 3 minutes no instance within 4xx and 5xx returns from the homepage a response to the status check
- either shrink to two instances or rotate the two "healthy" instances behind the ELB.

Do I have to use the tabs (Monitoring and Capacity) that I mentioned above? Can anyone tell me that the above environment triggers are set up in AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

18.04 – DPI Scaling for Java App on i3

I'm trying to run Xilinx Vivado on Ubuntu 18.04. Under the Ubuntu GNOME session, the application excels well on my HiDPI display (scale of 2). However, I want to run i3, and running Vivado within an i3 session does not cause DPI scaling.

I know of a possible workaround for Java apps, but I can not even find Jvm's call for this program (they launch it from a compiled binary file).

I know that something The GNOME session causes the correct character behavior, but I'm not sure where to look. I have to find the thing and duplicate it in my i3 session.

Display – The scaling of the desktop environment is disabled on Ubuntu Budgie 18.04 under Surface Pro 3

I'm sorry if this is not the place to ask this question. Please tell us where to post something

I boot Ubuntu Budgie 18.04 next to Windows 10 at the same time on my Surface Pro 3. When I boot the device, I see the GRUB menu and choose Ubuntu. I have a problem with the overall desktop scaling.

To be clear, with Desktop I mean the whole operating system. For example, the login screen at the top right has small icons with a tiny username and password field to enter my credentials. Once logged in, the desktop is huge! The icons on the top panel are unusually large, the texts large, the applications like Chromium and files great. Basically every component of the desktop is big. Worse, when I connect to my external monitor, everything gets three times as big!

I have tried gnome-tweak-tool, and it is average but not ideal. Essentially, font size is taken into account in incremental scaling, but my problems with the external monitor are not resolved, or the icons in the top panel do not scale properly. Now I know there is a workaround: Use tweaks To get the fonts right, play with screen size and resolution, optimize the settings Budgie desktop settings to get the panel, etc. However, you can imagine that this does not result in uniform scaling throughout the system. I tried!

So I'm wondering what I can do to fix that. In particular, I am looking for scaling that is standard in Windows and Mac OS, and I am looking for a comprehensive / unified solution as opposed to "use this app to modify this and this other app". Personally, I thought there might be display driver issues, but I'm still relatively new in Ubuntu, so I was not sure.

Summary

Possibly useful information: Surface Pro 3, display adapter: Intel HD graphics family, Ubuntu Budgie uses X11, resolutions are all set correctly for each ad

Looking for a unified system-wide solution to correct operating system scaling. Tries gnome-tweaks and the results were not ideal.

Formatting – How can consistent scaling of [And], [Or]etc. be ready?

I've added two examples of what the expressions I want to reproduce look like:
Here [And] serves as both a binary operator and a universal quantifier. I know there are [ForAll] and [exists]but I want to reproduce what the book says.

Enter the image description here

In this picture [Or] serves as the existential quantifier.

Enter the image description here

This is what Mathematica produces when I put the same expressions in an equation cell:
Enter the image description here

The same thing happens with the established theoretical connections.[Union] and [Intersection]etc. It makes sense to scale some operator icons. For example, summation and integral symbols. But for these operators, I want to control their appearance with a minimum number of keyboard or mouse actions. What I really want is "capital letters" and "lowercase" variants of these symbols, which act in the same way as letters and numbers in terms of spanning.

Is there a way to accomplish this without affecting the behavior of other auto-scalable symbols? The scaling of these symbols in complex expressions is currently arbitrary and inconsistent. Exactly the same expression often scales differently, depending on the order in which it is entered.

I also want the formatting to be preserved as a PDF when saving.





cell[BoxData[
mold box[
RowBox[{
UnderscriptBox["["["["[Or]"," p "],
UnderscriptBox["["["["[Or]"," q "],
RowBox[{"(", 
    RowBox[{"2", "[InvisibleComma]"
RowBox[{
      SuperscriptBox["q", "2"], "=",
RowBox[{
       SuperscriptBox["p", "2"], "[And]"
RowBox[{"[Not]"
RowBox[{ "("
RowBox[{
RowBox[{
UnderscriptBox["["["["[Or]"," s "],
RowBox[{"2", "s"}]}], "=",
RowBox[{
RowBox[{
RowBox[{"P""[{"P""[{"p""[{"p""[And]"}],
UnderscriptBox["["["["[Or]"," s "],
RowBox[{"2", "s"}]}], "=", "q"}]}], ")"]]}]}]}]}], ")"]]}], TraditionalForm]], "Equation",
CellChangeTimes -> {{3.755520330280187 * ^ 9, 3.755520443924959 * ^ 9}, {3.757609467459089 * ^ 9, 3.757609620292385 * ^ 9}}]

Javascript – Print SharePoint calendars with automatic page orientation, scaling, and margins

I've added a print button to my SharePoint pages (with SP Online) so that only the calendar web part can be printed. The code for the push button is below.



I'm trying to automatically change the page orientation and scale of the page to landscape and 60% when the browser print preview opens. I've read online, and most sites say CSS needs to be used, but I could not get the CSS to apply to the page that opens the Print button. Here is the CSS code I wanted to use.


I would appreciate advice and help.

Customize 2D data points with a function that considers scaling, rotation, and translation

I have the following set of 2D data points:

data1 =
{
{21,557, 801,607}, {5.84689, 800,425}, {50,9284, 770.49},
{46.4516, 750.192}, {32.9808, 671.931}, {48.8067, 673.198},
{3.59394, 671.167}, {18.1513, 671.949}, {64.1628, 670.801},
{13.1805, 652.588}, {55.6619, 651.298}, {26.9262, 650.35},
{41.4876, 650.752}, {5.45129, 635.602}, {20.3858, 633.391},
{64.1931, 632.506}, {33.9168, 631.006}, {58.7559, 613.401},
{36.0045, 612.007}, {23.5348, 608.289}, {54.6781, 598.251},
{26.4914, 548.723}, {65.0549, 531.442}, {82.9996, 514.631},
{74.4132, 479.425}, {58.3295, 458.015}, {27.1816, 413.334}
}

I would like to apply ScalingTransform, Translation Transform and Rotation Transform to find the most suitable to transform data1 in data2, in which:

data2 =
{
{1530.03, 790.2}, {1514.13, 789.}, {1559.17, 758.9}
{1554.5, 738.5}, {1540.5, 660.237}, {1556.15, 661.154},
{1511.34, 659.395}, {1525.63, 660.167}, {1572.13, 658.656},
{1520.66, 640.844}, {1562.55, 639.132}, {1533.79, 638.607}
{1548.37, 638.933}, {1512.62, 623.985}, {1526.88, 621.69},
{1571.44, 620.556}, {1540.44, 618.794}, {1565.69, 601.532},
{1543.06, 600.093}, {1530.22, 596.423}, {1560.9, 586.053},
{1532.93, 536.587}, {1571.9, 519.25}, {1590.15, 501.882}
{1580.39, 467.111}, {1564.73, 445.615}, {1532.8, 400.935}
}

The corresponding points of data1 that should be converted into data2 are already sorted and at the same position of the lists.

I use the following name:

s = ScalingTransform[{sx, sy}, {psx, psy}];
t = TranslationTransform[{vecx, vecy}];
r = RotationTransform[theta, {prx, pry}];

The combined transformation for each point {x, y} from data1 is:

combined transformation = s.t.r;

and finally:

kombinierteTransformation[{x, y}] =

{sx (prx (-Cos[theta]) + prx + pry sin[theta]) + psx (-sx) + psx +
sx x Cos[theta] - sx y Sin[theta] + sx vecx,
sy (- (prx Sin[theta]) + pry (-Cos[theta]) + Prey) + Psy (-sy) + Psy +
sy x sin[theta] + sy y Cos[theta] + sy vecy}

The adjustment parameters are: sx, sy, vecx, vecy, theta,

The scale is centered at the point {psx, psy} and the 2d rotation is around the point {prx, pry},

I would hire {psx, psy} = {1, 1} and {prx, pry} = {1, 1},

How can I transform myself? data1 best in data2 and how can I determine the appropriate parameters and their errors?

opengl – btRigidBody Transforming and scaling the problem of the world

When I create a collision form for a rigid body (Box in this case), I use the position and scale of the vertices from the opengl matrix. The code looks like this:

glm :: vec3 boxDim = getBoxDim (verticesPositions, scale);
collisionShape_.reset (new btBoxShape (btVector3 (boxDim.x, boxDim.y, boxDim.z)));

When a simulation step is complete, I need to update the Opengl matrix for the object. I compute a new model matrix in this way:

btTransform transform = fixedBody-> getWorldTransform ();
float openglMatrix[16];
transform.getOpenGLMatrix (openglMatrix);

glm :: mat4 newModelMatrix = glm :: make_mat4 (openglMatrix);
newModelMatrix = glm :: scale (newModelMatrix, glTransform.getScale ());

My code works, but I wonder if there's a way to get the transformation returned by getWorldTransform to scale right now. Then I can skip this line of code:

newModelMatrix = glm :: scale (newModelMatrix, glTransform.getScale ());

Is Lighting Netowork really scaling and at what cost?

Ok, I understand that within LN, we can send cheap transactions immediately, but assume that we have global acceptance. The BTC price is then very high. It is obvious that this is due to the complete deflation of Bitcoin. So we have to pay in BTC for the creation / closure / deposit of channels in BTC, since the block sizes of 1 MB will be very high, a few dozen or even several hundred dollars per transaction. In order to be worth something, we have to send a lot of money to channel or send from someone who buys face2face / online for cash than directly via LN.
The next problem is that LN needs to use large HUBs to work most efficiently. Owners of these HUBs are likely to be exchanges, financial institutions, just people with a lot of money. Is not that a short way to the KYC through these HUBs?