When designing software, be it for the Internet or one of the popular desktop or mobile platforms, many developers can not think about how their design choices can affect the security of their application.
Some bad design decisions are made due to a time limit or the need to make an app "user-friendly". Some bad design decisions are caused by developers only knowing the security requirements of the app, or because they depend on third-party vendors for some features of their app.
The following describes how security issues occur with each selection. In addition, I will explain how a software architect can avoid these security disadvantages. The company Mobile App Development pays attention to the following when developing a mobile app.
1. You do not use a checklist for safe design
When many developers design and develop an app, they work to develop an app to accomplish the task at hand. They usually work against a deadline, and as the project progresses, safety can sometimes be thought-provoking if the app properly handles the given task.
Never go for a software design with security as a secondary requirement, but always design the app as a primary requirement with certainty. Security is about understanding what problems you can do and the problems you can not do anything about. A secure design checklist can help.
Microsoft's Patterns and Practices website is an excellent example of what a secure design checklist should contain. While the Redmond company has "withdrawn" this list, it still provides an excellent framework for creating your personal design checklist.
2. You do not think like a villain
Remember, no matter what type of app you're developing, it's likely someone is trying to hack your code. Whether it's for fun or profit, someone is out to reach you. It's also important from the setting "This app is safe because I develop it and I can not hack it!" They just do not approach the code from the (in) correct view.
Software security would be stronger if all designers, developers and managers are more confident that someone is "out to win".
Try to trade software security with the same mindset that a black hat hacker would do. Look at the code you are developing and see how the design could create uncertainties in your code. This feature you just added to restore the user experience can also improve the hacker experience.
Secure software design requires protection against attacks, exploits, and threats. If at all possible, it's a good idea to hire a hacker to check your app for holes. Ask them to really search your code for vulnerabilities, and then tell them how to exploit them.
3. They do not take into account the attack surface of an app
Feature crawl can be one of the most important factors in the insecurity of a mobile app. It would be great to include every feature that you or your customer think about, always approaching features from a security standpoint, before you run any additional features.
For example, while each app, especially web apps, has a search feature or help feature, consider enabling a user before enabling them. Limiting the overall likelihood of an attack is limited to authorized users only.
The attack of an application can also be increased by using APIs or third-party services. A mobile app is only as secure as it is about the security of your cloud services or the login-related security of your weakest partner. If the partners have security holes, your app has security holes.
4. You forget that small vulnerabilities are a major vulnerability
If you're aware of the small vulnerabilities in your app, avoid them building into a hole large enough for a villain to drive through a truck.
Minor vulnerabilities may not seem important in a large context, but any insecure "straw" increases the back of your security camel. Attackers can exploit every vulnerability very much, and many of them have the ability to chain enough small vulnerabilities together to cause a significant amount of trouble.
Take care of the small security issues as you design and develop your app. You will find that you will have less security issues.
5. You can not consider future code exploits
Setting up security in your software from the beginning is the best way to ward off potential outbreaks that are currently unknown to the industry. The bad guys could even use two functions that do not give a hack alone, but with the combination they can open a hole.
No application is ever really "done". I still need to develop or maintain software that did not require an update, such as: For example, to fix bugs, offer features or repair the back of the camel. Always integrate security into every phase of your development, whether during initial development or during troubleshooting.