facebook – Troubleshooting high CPU usage of the modern setup host

This high CPU usage of the Modern Setup Host is one of the most common errors encountered when installing a Windows feature update. Whenever the system receives some important updates once a year, this process may be displayed on the screen. However, there are often malfunctions and high utilization of PC resources such as CPU or hard disk. Unfortunately, this problem often occurs with different users and causes many other problems for Windows 10, 8, and 7 users. Additionally, with the high load on the modern installation host, this issue may affect the speed of the device, leaving it in the background is executed and causes a high load on the CPU or the disk. Although stopping the process is not always possible, it is one of the most common problems with Windows 10 devices that can be easily resolved by following these simple steps. Users do not have to worry about the problem that the CPU or hard drive of the Modern Setup Host is under heavy load because it is a recoverable problem.
Source: – https://karenmintonblogexpert.wordpress.com/

mcafee.com/activate | norton.com/setup | mcafee.com/activate |
mcafee.com/activate | norton.com/setup | office.com/setup

Troubleshooting – Defective screen on Nikon D3. How can I fix it?

I have a Nikon D3. One day, the back LCD screen unexpectedly stopped working. Only white lines are displayed, as in the attached picture.
I changed 4 screens:

  • the first: shows only a few bright green lines
  • the second: shows a little more lines, but this time they are white
  • the third (maybe the only broken screen): Only works the backlight
  • the fourth: works like the second one (is the one from the picture)

When I use HDMI, it seems to work well.

Can someone tell me what could be wrong?

View post on imgur.com

Troubleshooting – How to fix the "-.-" error and not be able to take pictures on an Olympus OM-D E-M10?

Is the -.- Should an objective lens be below? In this case, this means that there is no lens or the lens is not recognized (bad contacts in the socket or defective lens or lens not supported or added with a frame converter). This could also be the reason for MF. Nevertheless, there may be some settings that allow you to take pictures (conventional / fully manual lenses).

Javascript – Troubleshooting xhttp.setRequestHeader ("Content Type", "application / x-www-form-urlencoded");

I searched a lot. None of the questions here in the stack overflow solved my problem. Please do not mark my question as duplicate. It puts my profile in danger

Now I'm working on saving a lot of data from HTML into the database via AJAX Javascript to PHP
Here is my javascript code

save function ()
var hist = document.getElementById ("hist"). value;
var mission = document.getElementById ("mission"). value;

var xmlhttp = new XMLHttpRequest ();
xmlhttp.onreadystatechange = function ()
if (this.readyState == 4 && this.status == 200)

UserAccountInfo = this.responseText;
alert (UserAccountInfo);

xmlhttp.open ("POST", "savecompany.php", true);
xhttp.setRequestHeader ("Content Type", "application / x-www-form-urlencoded");
xmlhttp.send ("history =" + hist + "& mission =" mission);

The code crashes

    xhttp.setRequestHeader ("Content Type", "application / x-www-form-urlencoded");

If I have commented on this line
The warning comes to me with plan string
and the database saved plan string!

Here is my PHP file

Where is my mistake? Would someone help me please?

Troubleshooting – Panasonic DMW-FL360L flash does not fire, self-test and test / reset indicators flash even after the batteries are replaced

My Panasonic DMW-FL360L is not working anymore. I get the blinking Auto Check and Test / Charge displays, which usually indicate that the batteries are dead. Even after inserting a fully charged battery, I still get the flashing lights and the flash does not fire. The zoom head of the flash also does not move.

Is there a way to fix the problem without sending the flash for repair?

(The same steps should apply to the Olympus FL-600R, which is functionally identical.)

Linux – Troubleshooting QEMU

I'm trying to run Mac OS X on Linux / QEMU (for computer training purposes).

I have followed these instructions. Short review:

  • Install edk2 on the host and create the patched OVMF firmware blob described as "Enabling UEFI (Virtual Machine Successor) Support for Virtual Machines".

  • Create a bootable OS X image on the original computer. For this I have followed these instructions tailored to El Capitan. I have made sure that the copy on the host is the MD5 checksum.

  • Create a blank disk image on the host and boot to the ISO file via QEMU and the OSK key located on the original computer using the recommended script:

host # qemu-img create -f qcow2 mac_hdd.img 64G

Host-No. qemu-system-x86_64-machine q35, accel = kvm -bios ~ / OVMF.fd -m 4096
-cpu Penryn -smp 4, cores = 2
-usb-device usb-kbd -device usb-tablet
-device isa-applesmc, osk = "Our work with these words is protected, pleased with theft (c) AppleComputerInc"
-netdev user, id = usr0 -device e1000-82545em, netdev = usr0, id = vnet0
-device ide-drive, bus = ide.0, drive = MacDVD
Drive ID = MacDVD, if = none, snapshot = on, file = / media / er / Vol1 / Software / X / ElCapitan / ElCapitan.iso
-device ide-drive, bus = ide.2, drive = MacHDD
Drive ID = MacHDD if = none, file = / home / er / host / mac_hdd.img
-monitor stdio -serial file: log

The -Series Option based on this post

This brings me to a UEFI shell. I leave it. That brings me to a BIOS-like menu.

In the boot manager I tried to select each of the listed boot options. I'll do it for everyone. This brings me to a screen where PXE over Ipv4 starts and then back to the BIOs like menu. In other words, the boot does not start or does not go anywhere. Any troubleshooting tips?

Standard Boot Order

Troubleshooting – Why are some of my Point & Shoot movie photos in one-third bright white or orange?

My condolences, how your photos were made. It is always disappointing to find the movie in such a bad condition.

You may have a camera problem with film feed, potential light leaks, and possibly a developer / printer incomplete handling problem that has caused the negatives to be properly aligned.

If you look at the top photo on the right, you can see elements from at least one other image, possibly two. This indicates that the film in the camera has not been advanced far enough to get a clean film before the next shot. If multiple photos are taken in the same area of ​​the movie, the final image will be brighter and overexposed if there is much light in that part of the scene.

It's hard to tell if other problems were light leaks or overlapping exposures without knowing what the scenes really were. But some of them look like light is penetrating through seals on the back of the camera.

The final print registration may be wholly the result of the camera's poor image separation, a careless operator's mistake, or an automated computer system attempting to automatically detect frame edges.

  • In general, it is a good idea to consider any camera that you do not know as "broken" instead of assuming that it works properly. Unfortunately, many are not in good shape, and even cameras that we believe work well run the risk of suddenly failing us.

The camera can sit on a shelf at this point as art.

If you need to use a lab to develop your photos, be sure to consider services that will return the negatives if you do not already do so. There may be more usable images than the images provided on the prints, but if you are using a service This throws away your negatives and returns only prints / scans, then you are completely exposed to the graces of the technically oriented things for printing.

Configuration – Troubleshooting 500 internal server errors in IIS 8.5?

How do you tell the difference between an HTTP / HTTPS request that fails in an ASP .NET Core application and one that fails because of an incorrect IIS configuration?

In most cases, IIS and ASP .NET Core have different protocols, and the solution is often to disable HTTPS to find out which error is returned. However, the error messages from IIS seem to be about Internal HTTP 500 server error in the output of a W3C-formatted log message, and they do not specify anything else.

As far as I can tell, ASP .NET core applications are just behind IIS, and requests / answers are a kind of reverse proxy for the actual application.

I've encountered the following IIS configuration setting, where you can enable tracing of failed requests, and it appears that the deeper error messages are more likely to be logged Internal HTTP 500 server error is mentioned at the end of this documentation, but I'm not sure.