debian – Tengo dos lan pero derepente la lan de placa me ha dejado de funcionar y me pone unclaimed

Buenos días tengo un proxmox y tengo dos tarjetas de red en mi equipo pero una me ha dejado de funcionar de hecho hago un ip a y no me sale .

He hecho un lshw -class network y me sale una bien que es la realtek y la de placa me sale como unclaimed

Como puedo hacer que vuelva a estar en funcionamiento.

Tengo el proxmox parado porque no pueden arrancar las maquinas .

Y es muy urgente arreglarlo

Mil gracias de antemano

networking – Network:1 UNCLAIMED – Ask Ubuntu

Just purchased and installed a brand new Intex X520-10G-2S-X8 Dual Port SFP+ Adapter.
Ubuntu 20.04 not initializing the 2nd port. Showing ‘UNCLAIMED’. Updated to the latest kernel and tried the steps outlined in this question e1000e error -5 and UNCLAIMED network interface after installing ubuntu newly
Still unable to initialize the 2nd port.

sudo lshw -C network
  *-network:0 DISABLED
       description: Ethernet interface
       product: 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection
       vendor: Intel Corporation
       physical id: 0
       bus info: pci@0000:0b:00.0
       logical name: enp11s0f0
       version: 01
       serial: 80:61:5f:0a:38:16
       capacity: 10Gbit/s
       width: 64 bits
       clock: 33MHz
       capabilities: pm msi msix pciexpress vpd bus_master cap_list rom ethernet physical fibre 10000bt-fd
       configuration: autonegotiation=off broadcast=yes driver=ixgbe driverversion=5.11.12-051112-generic firmware=0x800003df, 1.2898.0 latency=0 link=no multicast=yes
       resources: irq:26 memory:ee300000-ee37ffff ioport:d000(size=32) memory:ee380000-ee3fffff
  *-network:1 UNCLAIMED
       description: Ethernet controller
       product: 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection
       vendor: Intel Corporation
       physical id: 0.1
       bus info: pci@0000:0b:00.1
       version: 01
       width: 64 bits
       clock: 33MHz
       capabilities: pm msi msix pciexpress vpd cap_list
       configuration: latency=0
       resources: ioport:d020(size=32)
sudo dmesg | grep ixgbe
(   12.796254) ixgbe: Intel(R) 10 Gigabit PCI Express Network Driver
(   12.916621) ixgbe: Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Intel Corporation.
(   13.280656) ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0: Failed to allocate MSI-X interrupts. Err: -12
(   13.437447) ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0: Disabling SR-IOV support
(   13.685802) ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0: Disabling RSS support
(   14.025948) ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0: Multiqueue Disabled: Rx Queue count = 1, Tx Queue count = 1 XDP Queue count = 0
(   14.367566) ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0: 8.000 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth, limited by 2.5 GT/s PCIe x4 link at 0000:00:08.0 (capable of 32.000 Gb/s with 5.0 GT/s PCIe x8 link)
(   14.728778) ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0: MAC: 2, PHY: 14, SFP+: 3, PBA No: FFFFFF-0FF
(   14.914401) ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0: 80:61:5f:0a:38:16
(   15.203035) ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0: Intel(R) 10 Gigabit Network Connection
(   15.398730) libphy: ixgbe-mdio: probed
(   15.597657) ixgbe: probe of 0000:0b:00.1 failed with error -5
(   16.106850) ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 enp11s0f0: renamed from eth0

Only a single port is showing available ‘enp11s0f0’

ip link show
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
2: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:22:19:61:63:30 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    altname enp4s0
3: eno2: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:22:19:61:63:32 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    altname enp6s0
4: enp11s0f0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 80:61:5f:0a:38:16 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

Should have just been plug and play?

wireless – My wifi is not showing/Network unclaimed

Actually, my WiFi was not working when I connected a Bluetooth device. So to solve it I ran this command:

echo "options iwlwifi 11n_disable=111n_disable=8bt_coex_active=1power_save=0 swcrypto=1" | sudo tee /etc/modprobe.d/iwlwifi.conf > /dev/null

and rebooted.

Now my WiFi is gone.
When I run:

sudo -lshw -c network

it showed “network unclaimed” for WiFi. But my Ethernet and Bluetooth are working fine

I tried to include a screenshot but an error occurred while adding a picture here.

Please help me to solve this problem.

networking – 20.04: Network UNCLAIMED for Ethernet Controller

Need help setting up an ethernet connection in my laptop. Wifi Connection works well but ethernet seems to have issues.

There is no option for wired connection in networks tab in settings as shown in image below.
enter image description here

lshw -C network outputs:

*-network UNCLAIMED       
       description: Ethernet controller
       product: RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller
       vendor: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
       physical id: 0
       bus info: pci@0000:02:00.0
       version: 15
       width: 64 bits
       clock: 33MHz
       capabilities: pm msi pciexpress msix cap_list
       configuration: latency=0
       resources: ioport:4000(size=256) memory:b1104000-b1104fff memory:b1100000-b1103fff
  *-network
       description: Wireless interface
       product: RTL8723DE 802.11b/g/n PCIe Adapter
       vendor: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
       physical id: 0
       bus info: pci@0000:03:00.0
       logical name: wlo1
       version: 00
       serial: 40:9f:38:f7:ca:8f
       width: 64 bits
       clock: 33MHz
       capabilities: pm msi pciexpress bus_master cap_list ethernet physical wireless
       configuration: broadcast=yes driver=rtw_pci driverversion=5.4.0-33-generic firmware=N/A ip=192.168.0.107 latency=0 link=yes multicast=yes wireless=IEEE 802.11
       resources: irq:129 ioport:3000(size=256) memory:b1000000-b100ffff

I have tried downloading and installing driver from realtek website, this github repo and apt install r8168-dkms but none worked.

I am using HP Laptop, Ubuntu 20.04, 5.4.0-33-generic

networking – Ubuntu Server 20.04 no internet connection/network unclaimed

I tried installing Ubuntu Server 20.04 on my Gigabyte B550i with an Realtek Ethernet Controller and wireless. I want to use ethernet (I don’t care about wireless), but I wasn’t able to set it up during installation and cat /etc/netplan.*yaml returns just:

network:
      version 2

and lshw -C network lists both networks, the ethernet one unclaimed, the wireless one diabled. /etc/network/interfaces is empty, I tried different file contents, but nothing worked.

What am I doing wrong? I tried installing some kind of drivers, but didn’t succeed.

dnd 5e – Will the invisibility spell be canceled with an unclaimed spell action and no attack? Both the spell and the effects of the spell?

An interesting combination emerged in the gameplay: An invisible party member decided to defend another party member using his reaction without spells and no attacks (arrow-marksmen).

This led to two questions:

In the description for the invisibility Spell (PH p. 254), states:

The spell ends for a target that attacks or acts on a spell.

So this led to the question – Does this reaction end with invisibility?

In the description for the Backstop plate, it says

Whenever an attacker makes a ranged attack on a
Target within 5 feet of you, you can use your reaction to that
Target of the attack instead.

In fact, there is a long list of reactions without spells that can not be attacked (Bardean inspiration, misdirection, etc.) that can influence an attack.

Question 1: Does this reaction cause the invisibility spell to stop?

The consensus at the table was "No, it's neither a spell nor an attack."

But wait, there is more!

According to the rules of invisible Condition (PHB, p. 291):

Attack rolls against you have disadvantage.

Theoretically, the attack should now be penalized even though it was already done.

This made us all scratch our heads (and the normal attack was missing anyway, so we continued)

Question 2: Is rerouting an attack on an invisible target now leading to an offensive attack?