How is it that so many victims were killed in just four years during the First World War?

Mechanized war, as a reply said. Tanks, bombers and fighters, poison gases. Big Bertha cannons that could shoot missiles of a mile or more. I do not know if the Jeep was in use in World War I, but the car and the truck appeared. Also wireless telegraphy. Some things may have been in the last Boer War; But I doubt it. When in use, they were better developed in the 1914-18 war.

Grave diseases. Flanders was cold and wet, and the mud contained the excrement of farm animals. Longer exposure in these trenches killed many.

Russia's bad government. Russia was not prepared for a major war. It could not produce the weapons and ammunition it needed. It lost waves of soldiers and the survivors thought they were being sacrificed to save France, not their own nation. The Czar was ineffective and fatalistic, and he got into a feud between his uncle, the Chief of the Armed Forces, Grand Duke Nicholas, and his wife and their close adviser Rasputin (who did not know much about warfare). Besides, the Russians thought the Tsars were working for the enemy. She was born in Germany and her brother, the Grand Duke of Hesse, was in the German army.

Incompetence and strife among the Allied generals. The French and British distrusted each other, resulting in poor cooperation. The Imperial forces were led by British generals who considered them cannon fodder to spare British Tommy. That did not increase the morale of the Canadians. Not that Tommy was spared much. They died friend with friend and lost their lieutenants as fast as the Canadians. The bad planning of Gallipoli has also lost a lot against the Turks.

I do not know much about German victims, but four years of fighting, gasification and dogfights could not have been good for them either.

Do the media make Trump more victims than previous presidents?

Making someone a victim means sacrificing someone by somehow harming or exploiting him.

I suppose some media exploit Trump's incompetence by reporting what he says and does, and his advocates prefer to see him as a victim instead of admitting that they have fallen in love with a fraudster. But I do not think that's really a victimization.

dnd 3.5e – How much can a bad truenamer bring lazy victims to a low-level group?

The Truenamer manual gives the following interesting advice:

Open the book of hideous darkness and read the rules for the victims. Then remember how good Truenamer is at putting their knowledge checks to stupid levels. Between the INT focus, the fact that you probably only need knowledge skills, the Knowledge Focus feature, Universal Aptitude, and Hidden Truth, you can get a frighteningly high K: Religion check (this is used on victims), of course, from level 3 or so. Consider a perfectly reasonable illuminal truenamer with 16 INT and the Naen seal. , , For almost no investment you get 6 (ranks) + 3 (INT) + 3 (knowledge focus) + 2 (Naen) + 5 (universal talent) + 10 (hidden truth) = +29 before you even roll the dice. If you've added all the trivia listed on page 5. 27 of the BoVD you will almost certainly reach the highest level of rewards. And that is at the level 3The only real investment made is in K: religion (does not hurt) and the insertion of your knowledge focus on religion (which in turn is not a big loss). Even if you do not add all the traps, you're just letting a living being kill you everyday (but probably unconscious), long enough to whip out your dagger and recite your vile master's name a few times, and you will guaranteed to roll high enough to get a free Planar Ally. How cute is that? Sure, you have to be wickedly repentant and your GM has to join, but all the rules are right.

Suppose that we have a DM that follows the rules of sacrifice RAW and that the truenamer is as described above (ie at low level and rates those exams +29 without trying) and the above listed foul victim once per Day for you party at a low level. How much benefit will the party have? For simplicity's sake, suppose they are sacrificing something commonplace in a wicked campaign, such as a lower man.

For reference, I have uploaded a screenshot of the two relevant tables here. Of special interest, I can not help but notice that many of these benefits are treated as if they came from a Level 20 caster. Could this be groundbreaking?

The victims of Identity 2 were buried in concrete barrels

According to a private source of VietNamNet, on the evening of May 18, the police department declared the murder of two bodies in concrete blocks in Binh Duong on May 15.
From the evidence gathered, Binh Duong police issued a search warrant to suspects. After a few hours, in early May, hotel staff informed a residential district of Tiamo Phu Thinh (Phu Tho District, Thu Dau Mot City), a police office of 4 women (where 2 women are looking) to rent a room at the hotel for about a month now ….

The victims of Identity 2 were buried in concrete barrels

MAC address – MAC spoofing – keep victims away

I have successfully performed a MAC spoofing attack on my open (ad hoc) network with the Macchanger tool (operating system: Kali linux).

I would like to know how the connection can be kept alive (to keep the computer out of the network with the real Mac), as the Windows machine obviously casts when trying to reconnect through the victim's computer (Windows 10) my potash host from the network.

Hotels – victims of a holiday Scam, how should I receive the refund?

I booked accommodation through booking.com for a stay in London UK June 1 through June 7, 2019 on June 23. I used my credit card. They deducted the full amount on the 25th. After that, I have several times updated my check in request at booking.com. However, the request was expired due to lack of response from the owner. I also tried to reach by phone and emails, but little to no response from them.

Here are the reasons why I am firmly convinced that I am a cheater:

  1. The property I booked is no longer available on booking.com. Property name Westminster Gardens is located at 24 Strutton Ground, Westminster Borough, London SW1P 2HR, United Kingdom. I checked this address and this is the address of a hair salon.
  2. They use the same images with different names and different places in booking.com. New name: London Prime Homes in West End and Westminister with new address: 104-105 Pall Mall, Westminister Borough, London, SW1Y 5EW, United Kingdom.
  3. You send me the second bill with the message that the amount is not paid.
  4. You have used 3 different phone numbers in 3 different places and 2 different email addresses:
    In the Booking.com website has: +447553076066. The bill they sent on December 25 is: +447523145097 and the following e-mail address: booking@ourfamilyhomesltd.com.
    They sent a second bill on January 8 and said that the amount was unpaid, even though they deducted the full amount on December 25th. The second one had the phone number: +447923337233 and another e-mail address: abv.homes@outlook.com.
  5. The first phone number +447553076066 is attached to an organization in the UK: www.champinternational.org.

Complaint on booking.com, but it's been almost a month and they have not found a solution.