Security – Are Lightweight LN Purses Vulnerable to Withholding Transactions?

As far as I know, LN requires the user to watch the blockchain for a timed sanction. Running a full node, however, is likely to be a heavy burden for some users, especially for mobile phones. I once heard that an improved lightweight wallet protocol (like Neutrino) can solve this problem, but I've also heard that such a lightweight wallet protocol still relies on the entire node or server that provides the service, implied. In particular, a malicious full node may hide transactions from its clients, which appears to be a potential threat to lightweight LN wallets.

Vulnerable Web Application – SQL injection that is hard to find with a regular scanner like SQL Map

I am creating a "vulnerable web application".

Is there a way to create an SQL injection vulnerability that is easy to spot in manual testing, but very difficult (or impossible) when a normal SQL scanner such as SQL Map or Burp Active Scan is detected?

This is important to me because I want to find out which testers can detect the scanner without the scanner.

One possibility that immediately came to my mind would be if the user had only one way to submit the form, but that would be too impractical.
I could use one-time tokens (csrf), but it's relatively easy to tell a scanner to get a new one before each request.

Ubiquiti devices vulnerable to new attacks

Ubiquiti devices prone to new attacks | Web Hosting Talk

& # 39);
var sidebar_align = & right; & # 39 ;;
var content_container_margin = parseInt (& # 39; 350px & # 39;);
var sidebar_width = parseInt (& # 39; 330px & # 39;);
// ->

  1. Ubiquiti devices vulnerable to new attacks…to-new-attack/

Similar topics

  1. Reply: 4

    Last contribution: 04-12-2014, 13:18

  2. Reply: 18

    Last contribution: 31.10.2007, 11:03 clock

  3. Reply: 2

    Last contribution: 11-11-2003, 10:39

  4. Reply: 13

    Last contribution: 10-24-2000, 10.04 clock

  5. Reply: 3

    Last contribution: 10-18-2000, 03:11 clock

booking permissions

  • you not allowed post new threads
  • you not allowed post reply
  • you not allowed Post attachments
  • you not allowed Edit your posts

Is it possible to make an output of an encryption algorithm more vulnerable to cryptanalysis by changing the input?

For example (very simplified), encryption / decryption usually works as follows:

encrypted_data = encrypt (data, key)
data = decrypt (encrypted_data, key)

I wonder if it is possible to change the input dates so that the function encode would be reversible without that key (here the modification is called as + x):

encrypted_data = encrypt (data + x, key)
data = modified_decrypt (encrypted_data, x)

What I mean by modification is: perhaps it is possible to add a repeated pattern to the input data, or it may be a permutation, or it may find a particular x as a function of data.

If yes how? If not, why?

I know it would be specific to an encryption algorithm. So I need to know if this is possible with a popular encryption algorithm.

P.S. Possible applications include: data recovery for such viruses as Wannacry or identification of information loss in organizations, etc.

Is this JavaScript code vulnerable to DOM-based XSS?

In and of itself, no, because you actually do nothing with the user-driven text except run Splits() on it and no way to use that to inject code.

It's not very good code – you should use it instead of location.href.split ("?")[1] For example, you almost never want to use a real string, such as "none", to indicate the absence of a value, especially if the expected type of the value is string (use one of the built-in values, such as zero or not defined) – but it is not inherently uncertain. Of course, depending on what you have do It could easily become vulnerable to your variables, but it is not.

To avoid adding a vulnerability:

  • Under no circumstances use eval () on user-influenced data. It is best to avoid it altogether (and its equivalents).
  • Do not use user-controlled data as an identifier for JavaScript objects, especially if the user has some control over the value assigned to a property or passed to a function.
  • Do not include user-influenced data in the DOM (for example, using innerHTML) without first disinfecting it, and if possible, use functions or properties that automatically disinfect the content instead of trying it for yourself.
  • Use user-driven data to create URLs (from top-level navigation to image sources) to prevent an attacker from controlling the recipient of the request in a way that causes information to be lost or malicious content to be loaded.

xss – SQL Injection over parameters, vulnerable or not?

I've tried a few things, but it seems that it's not prone. However, I can run XSS over errors it triggers.


Failed to convert property value of type java.lang.String to required type boolean for property ParameterValue; The nested exception is java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid Boolean value [false]

As you can see, it's Java backend running on Tomcat.

I have no experience with JDBC and am therefore unsure.

magento2 – Is there something crazy going on with the magento critical scanner for vulnerable data?

I upgraded my site to magento2.3 a few hours ago, but every few minutes I get emails from other users' servers telling me to install SUPEE-5344, which I thought was years old was?

I checked the email headers to confirm that they came from a large number of servers – but they will be my security scanner login address (I use a completely different address for admin in my magento installation).

Javascript – Is this code vulnerable to DOM-based XSS jquery animations?

Is this code vulnerable to DOM-based XSS?

The application uses jQuery 1.12.4, and I've found that data is read from window.location.hash and passed to $ () as follows:

var target_ = window.location.hash.substr (1);
$ (& Html, body & # 39;). animate ({scrollTop: $ ("." + target_). offset (). top – $ (". site-header"). outerHeight ()}, 1000);

With which payload could I trigger an alert box or execute a JS code? Is this code vulnerable or 100% secure?

Is this code vulnerable to dome-based XSS?

Is this code vulnerable to DOM-based XSS?

The application uses jQuery 3.3.1 and I have noticed that data is being read

window.location.hash and went to $ () about the following statements:

var hash = window.location.hash.substring (1);
var elem = $ (& # 39; # reports_nav_links. & # 39; + hash);

The link I have is something like that / graph # injection point

Any parameter I insert after the hash icon will display the following error in the browser console:

Error: syntax error, unknown expression: #reports_nav_links .injection-point

With which payload could I trigger an alert box or execute a JS code? Is this code vulnerable or 100% secure?

DreamProxies - Cheapest USA Elite Private Proxies 100 Private Proxies 200 Private Proxies 400 Private Proxies 1000 Private Proxies 2000 Private Proxies - Buy Cheap Private Proxies Buy 50 Private Proxies Buy 100 Private Proxies Buy 200 Private Proxies Buy 500 Private Proxies Buy 1000 Private Proxies Buy 2000 Private Proxies ProxiesLive New Proxy Lists Every Day Proxies123
Proxy Sites Proxy Tunnels Proxy List Working Proxy Sites Hotproxysite Proxy Sites Proxy Sites Anonymous Proxy Anonymous Proxies Proxy Servers Free Proxies Free Proxy List Proxy List Zoxy Proxy List PR liste all proxy sites More Proxies netgofree netgofree Hide-MyIp - The Best Proxy List American Proxy List Web Proxy Submit Proxies Updated Proxy List Updated Proxy List Bypass Proxy Sites Free Proxies List Evolving Critic Business Web Directory Free Proxy List iShortIt MyProxyList Online Proxies Go Proxies Need Proxies PrivateProxies Proxies4MySchool Proxies4Work Free Proxy List Free Proxy Sites ProxyInside Wiksa Proxy Free Proxy List ProxyNoid Proxy List Free Proxy List Proxy Sites Proxy TopList ProxyVille UK Proxy WebProxy List - Listing the best Web Proxies Free Proxy List SchoolProxiesList Stay Anonymous Proxy List The Power Of Ninja Proxy List UNubstruct Free proxy sites Free proxy sites