As far as I know, LN requires the user to watch the blockchain for a timed sanction. Running a full node, however, is likely to be a heavy burden for some users, especially for mobile phones. I once heard that an improved lightweight wallet protocol (like Neutrino) can solve this problem, but I've also heard that such a lightweight wallet protocol still relies on the entire node or server that provides the service, implied. In particular, a malicious full node may hide transactions from its clients, which appears to be a potential threat to lightweight LN wallets.
Tag: vulnerable
Why is Windows 7 vulnerable wscript? [on hold]
I want to know why, when we use usemodule privesc / bypassuac_wscript in Powershell Empire gives us administrator rights?
How does this work? What makes Windows 7 vulnerable?
Vulnerable Web Application – SQL injection that is hard to find with a regular scanner like SQL Map
I am creating a "vulnerable web application".
Is there a way to create an SQL injection vulnerability that is easy to spot in manual testing, but very difficult (or impossible) when a normal SQL scanner such as SQL Map or Burp Active Scan is detected?
This is important to me because I want to find out which testers can detect the scanner without the scanner.
One possibility that immediately came to my mind would be if the user had only one way to submit the form, but that would be too impractical.
I could use one-time tokens (csrf), but it's relatively easy to tell a scanner to get a new one before each request.
Ubiquiti devices vulnerable to new attacks
& # 39);
var sidebar_align = & right; & # 39 ;;
var content_container_margin = parseInt (& # 39; 350px & # 39;);
var sidebar_width = parseInt (& # 39; 330px & # 39;);
// ->
-
Ubiquiti devices vulnerable to new attacks
https://www.zdnet.com/article/over-4…to-new-attack/
Similar topics
-
Reply: 4
Last contribution: 04-12-2014, 13:18
-
Reply: 18
Last contribution: 31.10.2007, 11:03 clock
-
Reply: 2
Last contribution: 11-11-2003, 10:39
-
Reply: 13
Last contribution: 10-24-2000, 10.04 clock
-
Reply: 3
Last contribution: 10-18-2000, 03:11 clock
booking permissions
Is it possible to make an output of an encryption algorithm more vulnerable to cryptanalysis by changing the input?
For example (very simplified), encryption / decryption usually works as follows:
encrypted_data = encrypt (data, key)
data = decrypt (encrypted_data, key)
I wonder if it is possible to change the input dates so that the function encode would be reversible without that key (here the modification is called as + x):
encrypted_data = encrypt (data + x, key)
data = modified_decrypt (encrypted_data, x)
What I mean by modification is: perhaps it is possible to add a repeated pattern to the input data, or it may be a permutation, or it may find a particular x as a function of data.
If yes how? If not, why?
I know it would be specific to an encryption algorithm. So I need to know if this is possible with a popular encryption algorithm.
P.S. Possible applications include: data recovery for such viruses as Wannacry or identification of information loss in organizations, etc.
Is this JavaScript code vulnerable to DOM-based XSS?
In and of itself, no, because you actually do nothing with the user-driven text except run Splits() on it and no way to use that to inject code.
It's not very good code – you should use it location.search instead of location.href.split ("?")[1] For example, you almost never want to use a real string, such as "none", to indicate the absence of a value, especially if the expected type of the value is string (use one of the built-in values, such as zero or not defined) – but it is not inherently uncertain. Of course, depending on what you have do It could easily become vulnerable to your variables, but it is not.
To avoid adding a vulnerability:
- Under no circumstances use
eval ()on user-influenced data. It is best to avoid it altogether (and its equivalents). - Do not use user-controlled data as an identifier for JavaScript objects, especially if the user has some control over the value assigned to a property or passed to a function.
- Do not include user-influenced data in the DOM (for example, using
innerHTML) without first disinfecting it, and if possible, use functions or properties that automatically disinfect the content instead of trying it for yourself. - Use user-driven data to create URLs (from top-level navigation to image sources) to prevent an attacker from controlling the recipient of the request in a way that causes information to be lost or malicious content to be loaded.
xss – SQL Injection over parameters, vulnerable or not?
I've tried a few things, but it seems that it's not prone. However, I can run XSS over errors it triggers.
error:
Failed to convert property value of type java.lang.String to required type boolean for property ParameterValue; The nested exception is java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid Boolean value [false]
As you can see, it's Java backend running on Tomcat.
I have no experience with JDBC and am therefore unsure.
magento2 – Is there something crazy going on with the magento critical scanner for vulnerable data?
I upgraded my site to magento2.3 a few hours ago, but every few minutes I get emails from other users' servers telling me to install SUPEE-5344, which I thought was years old was?
I checked the email headers to confirm that they came from a large number of servers – but they will be my security scanner login address (I use a completely different address for admin in my magento installation).
Javascript – Is this code vulnerable to DOM-based XSS jquery animations?
Is this code vulnerable to DOM-based XSS?
The application uses jQuery 1.12.4, and I've found that data is read from window.location.hash and passed to $ () as follows:
var target_ = window.location.hash.substr (1);
$ (& Html, body & # 39;). animate ({scrollTop: $ ("." + target_). offset (). top – $ (". site-header"). outerHeight ()}, 1000);
With which payload could I trigger an alert box or execute a JS code? Is this code vulnerable or 100% secure?
Is this code vulnerable to dome-based XSS?
Is this code vulnerable to DOM-based XSS?
The application uses jQuery 3.3.1 and I have noticed that data is being read
window.location.hash and went to $ () about the following statements:
var hash = window.location.hash.substring (1);
var elem = $ (& # 39; # reports_nav_links. & # 39; + hash);
The link I have is something like that / graph # injection point
Any parameter I insert after the hash icon will display the following error in the browser console:
Error: syntax error, unknown expression: #reports_nav_links .injection-point
With which payload could I trigger an alert box or execute a JS code? Is this code vulnerable or 100% secure?
