Ubiquiti devices vulnerable to new attack

Vulnerable Web Application – SQL injection that is hard to find with a regular scanner like SQL Map

I am creating a "vulnerable web application".

Is there a way to create an SQL injection vulnerability that is easy to spot in manual testing, but very difficult (or impossible) when a normal SQL scanner such as SQL Map or Burp Active Scan is detected?

This is important to me because I want to find out which testers can detect the scanner without the scanner.

One possibility that immediately came to my mind would be if the user had only one way to submit the form, but that would be too impractical.
I could use one-time tokens (csrf), but it's relatively easy to tell a scanner to get a new one before each request.

Ubiquiti devices vulnerable to new attacks

Ubiquiti devices prone to new attacks | Web Hosting Talk

& # 39);
var sidebar_align = & right; & # 39 ;;
var content_container_margin = parseInt (& # 39; 350px & # 39;);
var sidebar_width = parseInt (& # 39; 330px & # 39;);
// ->

Ubiquiti devices vulnerable to new attacks

https://www.zdnet.com/article/over-4…to-new-attack/

booking permissions

you not allowed post new threads
you not allowed post reply
you not allowed Post attachments
you not allowed Edit your posts

Forum rules

Is it possible to make an output of an encryption algorithm more vulnerable to cryptanalysis by changing the input?

For example (very simplified), encryption / decryption usually works as follows:

encrypted_data = encrypt (data, key)
data = decrypt (encrypted_data, key)

I wonder if it is possible to change the input dates so that the function encode would be reversible without that key (here the modification is called as + x):

encrypted_data = encrypt (data + x, key)
data = modified_decrypt (encrypted_data, x)

What I mean by modification is: perhaps it is possible to add a repeated pattern to the input data, or it may be a permutation, or it may find a particular x as a function of data.

If yes how? If not, why?

I know it would be specific to an encryption algorithm. So I need to know if this is possible with a popular encryption algorithm.

P.S. Possible applications include: data recovery for such viruses as Wannacry or identification of information loss in organizations, etc.

Is this JavaScript code vulnerable to DOM-based XSS?

In and of itself, no, because you actually do nothing with the user-driven text except run Splits() on it and no way to use that to inject code.

It's not very good code – you should use it location.search instead of location.href.split ("?")[1] For example, you almost never want to use a real string, such as "none", to indicate the absence of a value, especially if the expected type of the value is string (use one of the built-in values, such as zero or not defined) – but it is not inherently uncertain. Of course, depending on what you have do It could easily become vulnerable to your variables, but it is not.

To avoid adding a vulnerability:

Under no circumstances use eval () on user-influenced data. It is best to avoid it altogether (and its equivalents).
Do not use user-controlled data as an identifier for JavaScript objects, especially if the user has some control over the value assigned to a property or passed to a function.
Do not include user-influenced data in the DOM (for example, using innerHTML) without first disinfecting it, and if possible, use functions or properties that automatically disinfect the content instead of trying it for yourself.
Use user-driven data to create URLs (from top-level navigation to image sources) to prevent an attacker from controlling the recipient of the request in a way that causes information to be lost or malicious content to be loaded.

xss – SQL Injection over parameters, vulnerable or not?

I've tried a few things, but it seems that it's not prone. However, I can run XSS over errors it triggers.

error:

Failed to convert property value of type java.lang.String to required type boolean for property ParameterValue; The nested exception is java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid Boolean value [false]

As you can see, it's Java backend running on Tomcat.

I have no experience with JDBC and am therefore unsure.

magento2 – Is there something crazy going on with the magento critical scanner for vulnerable data?

I upgraded my site to magento2.3 a few hours ago, but every few minutes I get emails from other users' servers telling me to install SUPEE-5344, which I thought was years old was?

I checked the email headers to confirm that they came from a large number of servers – but they will be my security scanner login address (I use a completely different address for admin in my magento installation).

Javascript – Is this code vulnerable to DOM-based XSS jquery animations?

Is this code vulnerable to DOM-based XSS?

The application uses jQuery 1.12.4, and I've found that data is read from window.location.hash and passed to $ () as follows:

var target_ = window.location.hash.substr (1);
$ (& Html, body & # 39;). animate ({scrollTop: $ ("." + target_). offset (). top – $ (". site-header"). outerHeight ()}, 1000);

With which payload could I trigger an alert box or execute a JS code? Is this code vulnerable or 100% secure?

Is this code vulnerable to dome-based XSS?

Is this code vulnerable to DOM-based XSS?

The application uses jQuery 3.3.1 and I have noticed that data is being read

window.location.hash and went to $ () about the following statements:

var hash = window.location.hash.substring (1);
var elem = $ (& # 39; # reports_nav_links. & # 39; + hash);

The link I have is something like that / graph # injection point

Any parameter I insert after the hash icon will display the following error in the browser console:

Error: syntax error, unknown expression: #reports_nav_links .injection-point

With which payload could I trigger an alert box or execute a JS code? Is this code vulnerable or 100% secure?

Web Application – Is the following javascript code vulnerable to DOM XSS?

I have the following JavaScript code in an application that marks BURP as potentially vulnerable. However, I was not lucky enough to achieve it.

var hash = window.location.hash;
if (hash) {
$ (& A)[href=”‘+ hash +'”]& # 39)[0].click(); }

Enter the image description here

Is the above code vulnerable, and if so, with which URL fragment can it be executed?

dnd 5e – Do bullywugs have 1d6 damage and fall vulnerable on every high jump?

The PHB and the ground rules state:

At the end of a fall, a creature suffers knock damage for every 1d6 10 foot it fell to a maximum of 20d6. The creature ends up vulnerable unless it avoids damage from the fall.

The Statblock of the Bullywug (MM, p. 35) mentions:

Standing jump. The long jump of the Bullywug is up to 20 meters and the high jump is up to 10 footwith or without start.

So, if a bullywug jumps as high as possible, would it take 1d6 damage and become vulnerable?

Tag: vulnerable

Vulnerable Web Application – SQL injection that is hard to find with a regular scanner like SQL Map

Ubiquiti devices vulnerable to new attacks

Ubiquiti devices vulnerable to new attacks

Similar topics

booking permissions

Is it possible to make an output of an encryption algorithm more vulnerable to cryptanalysis by changing the input?

Is this JavaScript code vulnerable to DOM-based XSS?

xss – SQL Injection over parameters, vulnerable or not?

magento2 – Is there something crazy going on with the magento critical scanner for vulnerable data?

Javascript – Is this code vulnerable to DOM-based XSS jquery animations?

Is this code vulnerable to dome-based XSS?

Web Application – Is the following javascript code vulnerable to DOM XSS?

dnd 5e – Do bullywugs have 1d6 damage and fall vulnerable on every high jump?