PHP – How can I only render the website?

Next, I will use data tables on this page, with this table containing more than 3000 rows. I think it takes a lot of time to organize my spreadsheet table (which, in my opinion, means the page will be opened longer).

I'd like to recommend what to do to prevent the page from getting slow (it only contains this table if you're wondering if it contains other components). How can I render this table without taking over the data, as it contains some functions that I use p.

Thank you for your attention

Unique web design for a very low price for $ 125

Unique web design for a very reasonable price

Hi! there I am Mohammad Jahir Uddin Babor has completed my master's degree and then spent more than 5 years as a designer in an IT company. Now I work as a freelance full time employee. I am an expert in HTML5, CSS3, Javascript, Bootstrap. I have designed some excellent websites for my clients.


We are Allhyip Monitor Website Maker – advertising, deals

Now you can start your own Allhyip monitor

We can get ready Allhyip Monitor Website for you for a very low price, and you can start your own Allhyip Monitor webstie of today,

We offer everything in a finished website including

(I) Allhyip Monitor script

(ii) Domain and Hosting

(iii) logo

For details, you can visit our website or you can also contact us via Skype or Gmail

Skype: live:


sharepoint enterprise – Site There was no connection when reading the PDF document in Embed. Tag another website with one day

I am using SharePoint 2013 and I am having the problem of displaying the PDF document in the embedded tag.

Error displayed:

  1. Connection to SharePoint site in embedding rejected.

  2. The display of & # 39; http: //SITE/HR/EmployeeDoc/Passport.pdf' in a frame was rejected because multiple 'X-Frame Options' headers were set with conflicting values ​​('SAMEORIGIN, Allow-From'). Falling back to deny. IN console log.

Note :

It has been working perfectly for 3 years continuously and I receive this error only from 3 days,

I have changed nothing in the process within the past 5 months, within the SharePoint Master Page OR permission.

Only PDF document is not displayed, images are displayed correctly. and if I access the PDF URL directly in the address bar, there is no problem whatsoever.

Can a buddy suggest me why he refuses, and please state the solution.

Please help me to solve this problem.

Thank you very much.

magento2 – Problem with website URL

There has suddenly been a problem with URLs on my site. I currently have the following configuration.

However, if a user visited, the AU Store would load without redirecting to the / au / URL.

I am not sure why this will stop working and a 404 error will be returned when you visit

Can someone help with troubleshooting?

What code do I need to embed in my website for cross-domain Google Analytics (Universal Analytics)?

I have a website that's on multiple domains, and I want to track it universally. Currently, I do not care about statistics per domain, I just want to see the total page views.
I am also not interested in links between domains – they could be counted as two sessions.

So I've created a new property in the https: // dashboard, but I need to enter a "default URL" (where I've only selected one of my domains). Then I found the tracking code that starts with ,

I then used the tag manager to get information about universal tracking: That's why I created a Google Analytics: Universal Analytics tag with a variable with Google's tracking ID. Analytics property and with Cross-domain tracking configured with all my domain names (separated by a comma).
The Tag Manager has a button in the title bar that looks like this: "GTM -…" – It will pop up a popup window titled "Install Google Tag Manager" with a code I put into it Embed Head Tag: and code to embed in the body tag: ,

Do I just need to embed the ones? GTAG Code? only the Google Tag Manager Code? Or both?

Thank you very much

Website Design – When will Icons vs.. Icons with text vs. only text links used?

Symbols are notoriously ineffective as labels because they are very difficult to interpret properly without training or experience. In most situations, users learn the correct interpretation better with text than with symbols. See: Wiedenbeck, S. (1999). Using Symbols and Labels in an End User Application Program: An Empirical Study on Learning and Retention. Behavior & Information Technology, 18 (2), pp. 68-82.

Icons are especially poor for abstract objects such as "bill" or "bid" because abstract objects generally do not have a strong visual image (both "bill" and "bid" could be represented as paper documents, but how would you distinguish them? ). Likewise, icons are especially bad for actions (such as saving, publishing). It is difficult to clearly show a process with a picture. Yes, Toolbars are constantly using icons for actions. However, the toolbars were meant for experts, and yet users are often confused (on average, users only know six Word toolbar items after using Word for regular use) 2 years).

Icons can save space above the text, but at the price of recognition. For small symbols, eg. 16 x 16 pixels, it is very difficult for users to even know what they should be an image for, let alone what the image should stand for. One user I know thought the "floppy" icon to save was a picture of a TV. (She was old enough to know what a floppy disk is.) Personally, I used Word for years, thinking the change symbol was a kind of stylized Rosetta Stone. Experienced users can more easily rely on the stored physical location of the controls in the toolbar than in the symbol labels when selecting a control. Larger icons (for example, at least 32 x 32 pixels) can help detect them, but take up so much space that you can make better use of the space for plain text labeling. When space is limited, it is often better to use abbreviated text as symbols.

It is extremely difficult to find the right symbols. Do not try to develop a new icon without extensive user test iterations. Even then you can fail. The designers at Microsoft tried everything to create interpretable icons for the Outlook toolbar before they dropped text captions for key controls.

Icon labels also make it difficult to provide technical support (for example, "Click the yellow sheet with the blue check mark" versus "Click Accept.").

As a rule of thumb, only symbols should be allowed if at least two of the following three conditions are true:

  1. The place is very limited (ie, too small for text alone).

  2. The symbols are standardized (eg the disk image for saving).

  3. The icon represents an object with a strong physical analog or visual attribute (for example, a printer icon to access printer attributes, or a red rectangle to specify a red page background).

Tooltips are needed for icons when used alone. However, they are a poor substitute for text captions. Your users should not have to use your app to search for things. The fact that text captions never need graphical tooltips is a pretty good indication that text is better than symbols.

If space permits, symbols in combination with text are best. (I believe there are studies that prove this from the late 1980s, but I can not find it.) By using symbols with text, certain elements can be highlighted or made visually more interesting. This can also improve the scannability of the elements, but good text labels can do that as well. It is well known that users subjectively consider an app to be simpler if it contains symbols, even though it does not actually improve performance (see Wiedenbeck, 1999, supra). This is another reason to combine symbols and text.

I usually see the icon either above or to the left of the text label. I do not think it's inherently better than the alternatives, but it's a convention that you should follow if you have controls side by side so that the user can rely on the experience of what text label to which icon fits.