Powershell – adding members to the PSCustomObject variable – understanding what's going on

I'm trying to get an idea of ​​what's going on here, and I was wondering if anyone knows of a resource that could steer me in the right direction or explain it a little.

I am trying to create a PSCustomObject variable and then add members as follows:

$myObject += (PSCustomObject)@{
    FirstName = 'Bill'
    LastName = 'Bobbins'
    Age    = '30'
}

$myObject += (PSCustomObject)@{
    FirstName = 'Ben'
    LastName = 'Bobbins'
    Age    = '40'
}

The first code bit is executed correctly, but the second bit leads to an error "Method call failed because (System.Management.Automation.PSObject) does not contain a method with the name & # 39; op_Addition & # 39 ;." If I forward $ myObject to get-member, I can also see that $ myObject is TypeName: System.Management.Automation.PSCustomObject.

If I set $ myObject to an empty array first and then try to add members, I am successful. This code works without errors:

$myObject=@()

$myObject += (PSCustomObject)@{
    FirstName = 'Bill'
    LastName = 'Bobbins'
    Age    = '30'
}

$myObject += (PSCustomObject)@{
    FirstName = 'Ben'
    LastName = 'Bobbins'
    Age    = '40'
}

If I now forward $ myObject to get-member, I still get TypeName: System.Management.Automation.PSCustomObject. So my question is why in the second example I can add multiple members to $ myObject, but not in the first if the data type is the same for both examples.

Any help is greatly appreciated!

Thank you very much

What's the difference between[version]-[phone].img and twrp-installer-[version]-[phone].Post Code?

I know that I can flash and boot the image. But what are the zippers used for? I ask this because I noticed that images are often provided with corresponding ZIP files – not only for TWRP. And I want to understand how they relate and how these zippers are used and when.

For example: https://dl.twrp.me/enchilada/

Website Design – What's the best way to take screenshots with labels to show a program's features?

Regarding screenshots, just press the print screen button on Windows (on my keyboard, it's right next to F12). An image of your current screen is copied to your clipboard in full resolution. Usually Photoshop or Fireworks is the best place to edit the images, and you can just paste the copied screenshot into a new document. If you don't have any of these programs, GIMP is an open source option. If you are really desperate, PowerPoint can export as an image.

I encourage you to consider screencasts as well. Video almost always has a higher conversion rate. You can download CamStudio for free. If you don't like your voice, you can add subtitles.

What's up with centered websites? | Proxies-free

I just do not understand! What are these centered website templates for, which leave at least 50% of the actual screen area blank and which I am often forced to zoom in and out to search properly? My obvious guess would be space for ads, but unfortunately many of the websites that use them don't have ads either, so what for?

Is it just lazy not to separate themes / designs for cell phones and desktops, or why is this becoming standard everywhere? So damn annoying!

If anyone knows of a quick CSS hack / CSS solution to fix this nonsense, please let me know!

Example:

Half-wasted sidebar because there is more than enough space above the content.

Website Design – What's First – Branding or UX?

Typically, at larger companies, branding and UX are done by different teams or designers who work together to ensure that their work is consistent. For smaller companies or startups, however, it is common for a designer or team to meet both branding and UX requirements. When you are in this situation, it is important to remember that these two types of design often have very different goals.

At a high level, branding aims to communicate a company's ethos and remain recognizable and distinguishable in a variety of scenarios. The goal of UX is to make sure that everything they create is intuitive and consistent. The overlap between the two in the context of a website often depends on language / copy, user interface and illustration. That means you don't have to get ahead of each other.

For your situation, I would suggest that you start worrying about what is needed immediately. For example, if your company is brand new, is in a very competitive industry, and the company's mission and values ​​have not yet been determined, you should start branding first as this affects the design of your website. Conversely, if the company has been around for a while and has figured itself out, has a clear product strategy, and really only needs the visual aspects of branding (logo, colors, font, etc.), then you can completely start the UX first.

Like most things in design, there is no "right way" to do these things – it almost always depends on the context of the situation, the company, and your role.

Hope this helps a bit!

film – What's wrong with my scan?

I took some pictures with Ilford FP4 Plus 125 on my Canon Eos 3. I don't remember the lens, but it's probably a Sigma 50mm 1.4. The development and scanning was done in Samy's. The result looks flat, which I can fix by adjusting the levels in darktable. But the whole picture looks very soft, which I didn't expect from this film. Is there something wrong with the scanning or something else? Every other picture in the same role looks something like this. Thank you very much.

the scan
after setting in darktable

smartphone – what's the problem with the light in my photos?

The "problem", as you almost found out yourself, is shadowing the actual lens with your hand. If you move your hand between the light and the lens, you will see the point where the image changes and brightens.

You don't really have to be near the lens, just in the path of sunlight.

As you indicate in the comments, your lens is clean. As a result, the likely cause is likely to be the reflection within the lens structure itself. Of course, there is nothing you can do about it unless you ensure that the lens itself is not exposed to direct light.